tial - but does not exist - until a
token is produced or manifested. You promote another interpretation, which I do
not understand. Please explain.
Søren
Fra: John Collier [mailto:colli...@ukzn.ac.za]
Sendt: 31. juli 2014 21:36
Til: Peirce-L
Emne: Re: SV: [PEIRCE-L] [biosemiotics:6231] Re: bios
Søren wrote:
"Even to produces thoughts and feeling demands work. (073114-1)
That would be a biosemiotic view (but one that we
have not discussed much). But I think you are correct
in saying that Peirce did not do any work on this aspect
of sign production."
I am glad to learn this fact abou
I would agree with Søren, except that I find the grammar a bit odd. I
suppose that their could be signs that are not manifested, but I would
call these possible signs. The possibilities are real, and are most
likely thirds. I don't think that a possible x is an x. So I find it a
bit odd to talk a
Dear Clark and list
My I add a few thoughts? I agree that sign are reals, but when they manifests
as tokens their Secondness must enter the world of physics and thermodynamics
must apply. It is work to make signs emerge in non-verbal communication or as
language from ones feeling and thoughts.
