* Comments on the Peirce List slow reading of Joseph Ransdell,
"On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic",
http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/aboutcsp/ransdell/paradigm.htm
Re: Comments by Auke van Breemen (AB)
Auke & All,
By way of recalling our present engagement,
let's re
Gary F.,Jon, list,
I'll continue now with slow reading Joe's paper. Along with dealing with the
paper, I wish to share at least parts of the method I I've used in my classes
on text interpretation and argument analysis. So I'm just as interested in any
comments on the method, as I am in any co
Forwarded to peirce-l, partly as a test. Post intended for peirce-l from
Claudio Guerri. - Best, Ben
Mensaje original
Asunto: Re: [peirce-l] “On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for
Semiotic”
Fecha: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:35:58 -0300
De: Claudio Guer
It would be handy if 'reply' gives a reply to the list message instead of a
reply to the sender.
Jon,
You wrote a sentence that raises some questions, at least in my mind.
JA1:
An equivocation is a variation in meaning, or a manifold of sign senses, and
so
Peirce's claim that three categories a
