Frances, list,
It's a bit hard to respond to this because, though it's okay for you to
disagree with Peirce, you do so in ways that are vague to me; I don't really see
clearly the viewpoint which you hold, so it's hard for me to address it. For
instance, you say things like "...which signs
On 3/23/06, Benjamin Udell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il-Young Son, list,
Il-Young Son wrote,
I am not sure how many, if many, when pressed, would object to the notion
that there are fundamental limits to models and that the mapping (or the
mediator) between models and their corresponding
Hi, Il-Young,
Thank you for the clarification. Now I understand, too, what you mean about an
effort for which science is ill equipped, an effort more philosophical, and an
infinite regress in thirdness, i.e., the scientific enterprise as studying
itself.
This seems to happen in any field of
