[peirce-l] Re: Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop

2006-03-25 Thread Joseph Ransdell
Sounds to me like you should be at that meeting, Ben. Do you think they are posing the right questions? I mean the ones in the CFP that Gary posted? I am convinced that there is something important happening in this, but with an uneasy feeling that they are not picking it up by the right hand

[peirce-l] Re: Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop

2006-03-25 Thread Benjamin Udell
Joe, I don't know how Gary will respond, but I googled around a bit and I think that the main thing to keep in mind is that the knowledge involved is not at all necessarily _theoretical_ knowledge. It could be practical facts about who sits where, what's their phone number, who's in charge of w

[peirce-l] Re: Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop

2006-03-25 Thread Joseph Ransdell
Gary: I am wondering what is meant by a "knowledge system"? Is it the same thing as an accepted theory about this or that subject-matter? If so why not just call it a theory? But I doubt that that is what is meant. I know that people are now hired by corporations and by universities in part

[peirce-l] Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop

2006-03-25 Thread Gary Richmond
Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop Final CfP: CS-TIW 2006 Conceptual Structures Tools Interoperability Workshop (deadline 9 April) Content-Type: text/plain; cha

[peirce-l] Re: Please Have Mercy on Digest Subscribers

2006-03-25 Thread Joseph Ransdell
Thanks for reminding people not to use the reply button without also zapping away anything not necessary, which rarely requires including anything more than the message to which one is immediately responding, and often requires only a part of that (though not always: sometimes the entire message