[peirce-l] Re: the quality of good

2006-07-05 Thread Jim Piat
Dear Charles,   Always worthwhile for me to read your comments.  I've interspersed some responses. Charles Rudder wrote: Jim Pait, list,   Jim's comments on ethics and aesthetics brought to mind some things I have thought about but not thought through which include:   1.  Is any

[peirce-l] RE: the quality of good

2006-07-05 Thread Jim Piat
Dear Tom, Good to hear from you! Your wrote: Specifically, in what sense are "the good and the beautiful ... more fundamental" than truth? How could something be good or beautiful without it first being true that it is good or beautiful? And looking at the quote you provided: "Esthetics i

[peirce-l] Re: Neuroquantology Journal

2006-07-05 Thread Arnold Shepperson
Ben, Patrck, List   BU = Ben Udell AS = Arnold Shepperson   BU:  Peirce said that mathematics is the science which _draws_ necessary conclusions, as opposed to its being a science _of_ necessary conclusions. The science _of_ reasoning, necessary and otherwise, he called logic and placed it in philo