-11h30 palestra Vincent Colapietro (Peirces Rhetorical Turn) 11h30-11h45 comentador Vin¨cius Romanini11h45-12h05 resposta do palestrante e discuss¨es 12h05-12h15 s¨ntese avaliativaJORNADA - Tarde de 24/08: 14h00-14h40: Leituras Avan¨adas (Maria de Lourdes Bacha) 14h40-14h50: Quest¨es dos
Dears list members, specially Mariane, Gary, Joe, Arnold, Jacob and ClaudioThank you very much for youradvanced congratulations, which I expect to be worth of when I cometo actually defendthe results of my work on the 28th. AsJoe says,there will be muchgoing on about Peirce¨s semiotic in Sao
Joe, Robert, listMy question to De Tienne was motivated by the fact that he and Houser did not reproduced the Roman (or any other type) numbers when they published those same pages of the Syllabus in the Essential PeiceVolume 2 (see page 296). I took that as a deliberate intention to state the
Dear Joe, list The matter of the roman ordering numbers have always puzzled me. I remember once asking De Tienne about it at the PEP and he told me that Peirce never put the roman numbers on his original MS. They are just another work of Hartshorne and Weiss to make their point about how the
List, I think the best definition of Entelechy given by Peirce, done in terms of Semeiosis, can be found in his definition of "Perfect Sign" (EP2: 545, n.25). Best, ViniciusKirsti M¨¨tt¨nen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gary, Wilfred et al.Gary wrote: I'm still trying to get a firmer grip on the
