The Games Economists Play...

1994-10-12 Thread mcclintockbrent%faculty%Carthage
For what it's worth, here's what one of last year's Nobel recipients said about game theory in 1990: Douglas North: "Game theory highlights the problems of cooperation and explores specific strategies that alter the payoffs to the players. But there is a vast gap between the relatively clean,

Re: "Nobel" prizes in Econ.

1994-10-12 Thread peter_robertson
As it hasnt been mentioned already I'll add that Roemer's works draw heavily on game theory techniques, especially on Cooperative game theory in his "General theory of exploitation and class". From memeory, he uses the idea of a coalition to define exploitation. If an "agent" is in a coalition an

Re: "Nobel" prizes in Econ.

1994-10-12 Thread JTREACY
Treacy: Yes you can have all sorts of opponents. The simplest game in the beginning texts is the old prisioners dilemma game. If two felons do not rat each other out they win. If one rats on the other he gets a lesser sentence. The cops tell each one individually that the other is going to ra

game theory & power

1994-10-12 Thread Jim Devine
My impression (based on woefully inadequate knowledge) is that game theory can easily incorporate issues of power. For example, the result of one "player's" actions can a greater pay-off than another's exact same actions. Symmetry need not be assumed. Further, one can think of the standard "pr

Re: "Nobel" prizes in Econ.

1994-10-12 Thread John E. Parsons
Doug Henwood asks... > Is there any room in game theory for power - political, market, or > class? Or is it just a game among equals and individuals? > There is as much room for power in game theory as elsewhere. It is ever present in the games typically studied in neo-classical economics. S

Re: Trade Rules and Cigarettes

1994-10-12 Thread Eric Nilsson
This is a reply to the claim that "CUSFTA or NAFTA trade rules have been or could be used to prevent governments from doing things that are obviously in the public interest." This is certainly possible, but I'm not sure how often this will happen very often in practice. (Of course, whether gov

Re: "Nobel" prizes in Econ.

1994-10-12 Thread John Keefe
On Wed, 12 Oct 1994, Doug Henwood wrote: > Is there any room in game theory for power - political, market, or > class? Or is it just a game among equals and individuals? I don't know much about game theory myself, but a friend teaches it at NYU, and I've attended a few classes of his underg

Trade Rules and Cigarettes

1994-10-12 Thread E . Ian . Robinson
Sometimes when examples of how CUSFTA or NAFTA trade rules have been or could be used to prevent governments from doing things that are obviously in the public interest, the example of the NDP government's decision not to go ahead with its promise to introduce public auto insurance is cited. T

Re: "Nobel" prizes in Econ.

1994-10-12 Thread Doug Henwood
Is there any room in game theory for power - political, market, or class? Or is it just a game among equals and individuals? Doug Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Left Business Observer 212-874-4020 (voice) 212-874-3137 (fax)

Re: Income & poverty - last chance

1994-10-12 Thread Marc Breslow
please send income and poverty reports to Dollars & Sense, Email DOLLARS. Thanks Doug. Marc Breslow.

Re: "Nobel" prizes in Econ.

1994-10-12 Thread Jim Devine
from today's L.A. TIMES: "Textbook economic theory 'is about an isolated Robinson Crusoe- like individual coping with scarcity,' observed Samueal Bowles, an economics professor at the University of Massachusetts. Game theory, by contrast, 'is always about two or more t people , and they are copi

Re: "Nobel" prizes in Econ. (2)

1994-10-12 Thread John E. Parsons
Addendum to my original post... Back in the early 50's Nash actually published 2 solution concepts for games, one the non-cooperative solution which I described in the earlier post, and the other a cooperative solution. It is the non-cooperative solution which has proven so fruitful for neo-cla

Re: "Nobel" prizes in Econ.

1994-10-12 Thread John E. Parsons
> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1994 21:45:31 -0700 > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: "Nobel" prizes in Econ. > "Does anyone have anything intelligent to say about the work by this year's > winners of the so-