On Wed, 21 Jun 1995, Trond Andresen wrote:
> Tavis Barr says:
>
> > ..if there is no tendency of the profit rate to fall, why
> > has it been on a downward trend for the last 25 years or so?
>
> First: Are economists in agreement on this? I have economist
> acquaintances who say otherwise.
Tavis and then Trond write:
> ..if there is no tendency of the profit rate to fall, why
> has it been on a downward trend for the last 25 years or so?
First: Are economists in agreement on this? I have economist
acquaintances who say otherwise. Just asking.
>According to the OECD data I'v
To Doug:
It is a "vicious cycle" is it not? Certainly
"misery produces population" but that in turn reinforces
misery through a well-known mechanism. Anything that
can reduce birth rates in densely populated poor rural
areas, such as educating women, may help break this cycle.
No real
I am curious about the passages in Book III of CAPITAL where T. Barr finds
Marx adopting the idea of diminishing marginal returns. Where are they?
Thanks,
John R. Ernst
PS Sorry T. Barr but I lost your address as I tried to respond directly to
you.
>A colleague has requested help with citations. Evidently a recent
Forbes
>referred to "Roemer's now very au current theory about the economic
>leadership role technology will now play." Has anyone seen the Forbes
>article? Do any of you know to which of Roemer's efforts the article
might
>r
Tavis Barr says:
> ..if there is no tendency of the profit rate to fall, why
> has it been on a downward trend for the last 25 years or so?
First: Are economists in agreement on this? I have economist
acquaintances who say otherwise. Just asking.
Secondly: If this rate really has been falling