The London TIMES editorial (or was it a news story?) used the
same confusion that had been used over & over again so
effectively during the cold war: the confusion between principled
anti-Stalinism and anti-communism.
Orwell's anti-Stalinism is seen very clearly in HOMAGE TO
CATALONIA, where
Dr. Baiman,
Could you or anyone else please tell me where I could find the
statement by 101 economists on the effects of a higher minimum wage?
Sincerely,
Michael Garrity
Economics Dept.
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
(801) 581-7481
Gene writes:
>No, the mistake they made -- as did most of us on PEN_L, including myself,
>was in learning neo-classical economics in the first place. We learned it,
>along with them. And then we learned and embraced the critiques. But our
>minds are still screwed up by what we learned. And we
I agree with Blair, since it is impossible not to teach nc economics, then it
should be taught critically. Just a word on his germ theory -- I too learned
nc theory sort of after the fact. I read capital first.
viritically yours,
maggie coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 1:38 PM 7/13/96, Eugene P. Coyle wrote:
>>Only very weak neoclassicals "define efficiency as what the market does
>>and then miraculously deduce that the market is efficient."
>>
>>I have many students entering my classes these days who have been
>>bombarded with the western -- and now eastern
