Ken Hanly writes: >Except in the context of philosophical systems such as
that of Hegel I don't see that the concept of "relative truth" makes very
much sense. What would it mean to claim that I just sent this message to
Pen-L is a relative truth? <
To me it would mean that it was a more accurate
> Good one, Sid, or at least ostensibly so. In France they put
"Sans paroles" under some cartoons, to make clear that nothing
more is needed to explain the depicted relationships.
After my gasp of visceral amazement, however, I tracked the
Samsung stoner to its presump
Actually, if this technology works, it should also be able to support
telephone service and cable TV transmissions. If so, a major
re-shuffling of power in the telecommunications industries could be in
the offing. I rarely get worked up about new technology in this
industry, but this one may act
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 11 14:55:53 1997
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 97 13:22:24 EST
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: SAMSUNG SEEKS TO PURCHASE POLITICAL HELP
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You may know of the injustices perpetrate
> > What follows [are] excerpts of an article which appeared in Issue #507
> > of RACHEL'S ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH WEEKLY, August 15, 1996:
> >
> > For the past 15 years, Americans have been angry at government. Now, a
> > new survey shows, they are also angry at big corporations.
Don't give us
Forwarded message:
> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 1997 16:20:36 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William Black)
> Subject: The Emporer Has No Clothes!
>
> RISING PUBLIC ANGER AT CORPORATIONS
>
> Source: EDK Associates, 235 West 48th Street, New York, NY 10036; phone:
> (212) 582-4504; fax: (212) 265-9348.
