[PEN-L:84] Interesting article on privatization

1998-05-18 Thread michael
Wessel, David and John Harwood. 1998. "The Privatization of America: >From Roads to Uranium, Begins to Stir a Backlash." The Wall Street Journal (14 May): pp. A 1 and A 10. Roughly one in 20 federal inmates is now in afor-profit prison. Estero, a small Florida community hired Wackenhut Corp. to

[PEN-L:82] Re: On the status of the pen-l list

1998-05-18 Thread john gulick
At 05:43 PM 5/18/98 -0700, Michael Perelman wrote: >John G. refered to the "defections" of Louis and Doug. I would differ. > >With the demise of the Marxism lists on Spoons, Lou stepped up to fill a >void. As to Doug's list: Most major publications, such as the Nation, use >lists to engage a wi

[PEN-L:78] REVIEW: A Living Wage (fwd)

1998-05-18 Thread hoov
forwarded by Michael Hoover Forwarded message: > H-NET BOOK REVIEW > Published by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (April, 1998) > > Lawrence B. Glickman. _A Living Wage: American Workers and the > Making of Consumer Society_. Ithaca and London: Cornell > University Press, 1997. xvi + 220 pp. Notes, bibl

[PEN-L:81] Re: On the status of the pen-l list

1998-05-18 Thread Eugene P. Coyle
May Pen-L thrive!!! I am mostly a lurker, except when I need some help with something, but I learn a lot and have benefitted a great deal from PEN-L. I did post recently what I hoped would be a provocative message but it must have been one of the weekends that PEN-

[PEN-L:75] The Independent Institute - again

1998-05-18 Thread Eric . A . Schutz
Pen'ers -- A week or so ago, I sent out a request for info' on the Independent Institute -- and at that precise time apparently our Vax went cookies on us & I lost connection w/ pen-l & any messages anyone may have sent -- so here goes again: does anyone know anything about the FUNDING for the I.I

[PEN-L:74] Paul Sweezy on the Communist Manifesto and ecology

1998-05-18 Thread Louis Proyect
About a month ago I went down to Monthly Review for a brown bag and the discussion revolved around the financial crisis in Japan. Paul Sweezy and Harry Magdoff sat at the head of the table as they usually do. Harry had plenty to say on the subject. For his part, Paul was as silent as usual. He slo

[PEN-L:80] Re: Paul Sweezy on the Communist Manifesto andecology

1998-05-18 Thread James Devine
At 07:24 p.m. 5/18/98 -0400, Louis wrote: >What could Marx be referring to when he speaks of the "common ruin of the >contending classes?" In Sweezy's view, this eventuality could be the >ecological ruin of the world if capitalism is not overthrown. Such a >catastrophic ending--with the looming th

Re: On the status of the pen-l list

1998-05-18 Thread Mark Jones
I would like to see pen-l develop into a forum for deeper and more extended debates on political economy, archived, and serving some of the functions of an e-journal, ie, encouraging the submission of paper-length articles with folow up debates. Mark

[PEN-L:77] Re: Paul Sweezy on the Communist Manifesto and ecology

1998-05-18 Thread michael
Louis, I wish that you are correct, but I don't think so. My own research on this subject subjects to me that Marx was naively optimistic about the ability to exploit nature at the time of the Manifesto. The U.S. Civil War, which cut off cotton supplies and threw Engels into tight economic condi

[PEN-L:79] Re: On the status of the pen-l list

1998-05-18 Thread michael
John G. refered to the "defections" of Louis and Doug. I would differ. With the demise of the Marxism lists on Spoons, Lou stepped up to fill a void. As to Doug's list: Most major publications, such as the Nation, use lists to engage a wider audience. -- Michael Perelman Economics Department

[PEN-L:71] BLS Daily Report

1998-05-18 Thread Richardson_D
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- =_NextPart_000_01BD82A4.B1A8DDA0 BLS DAILY REPORT, MONDAY, MAY 18, 1998 After years of spectacular growth that has astounded the most optimistic analyst

[PEN-L:76] Re: On the status of the pen-l list

1998-05-18 Thread john gulick
Pen-l'ers, Speaking strictly as one among many, I don't want to see pen-l go down the tubes, but nor do I want it to become a more "formal" discussion group w/ book reviews, long manuscripts that would otherwise be published in journals, and so on. Nor do I want it to revert to what it seemed to

[PEN-L:73] Book Review

1998-05-18 Thread michael
I like Thad's idea about a series of book reviews. I think that we do not need an editor at this point. Let us just see what falls into the hopper. Also, I appreciate the new headers in our postings. Several people dropped off the list because of the lack of an identifier for the source. -- M

[PEN-L:72] Re: On the status of the pen-l list

1998-05-18 Thread thad
I think pen-L should weather the storm and continue. It is different in content and tone than the other lists, and to be blunt, more useful for my ongoing research purposes. It appears that what is needed though is for others (and this would include myself) on pen-l need to step forward and play t

[PEN-L:67] Re: On the status of the pen-l list

1998-05-18 Thread Doug Henwood
Nathan Newman wrote: >What the balance between LBO-TALK and >PEN-L should be I can't say, but more places to discuss these issues should >enhance opportunities over time, especially with a reasonable amount of >periodic >cross-posting to cross-fertilize ideas. Like I said when I started lbo-talk

[PEN-L:65] apology

1998-05-18 Thread Rosser Jr, John Barkley
I apologize for making insulting remarks about Louis Proyect's new list. I have not been on it and thus it was highly inappropriate of me to do that. Sorry. Barkley Rosser Rosser Jr, John Barkley [EMAIL PROTECTED]

status of pen-l

1998-05-18 Thread Rosser Jr, John Barkley
Egads! I've been fingered as the Bad Guy calling for the end of pen-l. I am calling for no such thing and hope that it does not come to pass. For those who did not see my posting on lbo-talk, it was directed at Doug Henwood in response to some guilty moaning he was engaging in rega

[PEN-L:66] Re: Yugoslavia and Hungary

1998-05-18 Thread Bove, Roger E.
While packing my bags, I realized that the kind author of this message told me to use his/her name, but never told me what it was. Roger -- From: owner-pen-l To: pen-l Subject: Re: Yugoslavia and Hungary Date: Friday, April 03, 1998 2:14PM In Slovenia you may c

[PEN-L:70] Re: On the status of the pen-l list

1998-05-18 Thread Laurence Shute
Michael, I agree with Jim Devine that pen-l serves a different purpose and should be retained. The market, after all, is a terribly biased mechanism as we should all know, and I would not favor letting it determine very much. Larry Shute Thanks for your message at 10:26 AM 5/18/98 -0700, Michael

[PEN-L:69] Re: On the status of the pen-l list

1998-05-18 Thread Peter Bohmer
> In addition, two of our most valued participants, Lou Proyect and Doug > Henwood, have begun lists of their own. Both of these lists overlap > with the purpose of pen-l. As a result of the down time and the > popularity of the two new lists, a lot of energy on pen-l has > dissipated. > I wa

[PEN-L:68] Query on Global Investment

1998-05-18 Thread Dennis R Redmond
Question for the list: where can I find ready stats on the net international investment position of the various countries? The Fed flow of funds, of course, outlines the US slide into debtor status, but I'd like to know who the global creditors are, and by how much. -- Dennis

On the status of the pen-l list

1998-05-18 Thread Michael Perelman
[I am cross posting this message to pen-l, lbo-talk and marxism because pen-l has been incommunicado for a while. Please post any responses to pen-l and do not clutter the other lists with this thread] For more than a decade, pen-l has been growing in terms of the number of participants and the