Forwarded message:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 19:51:14 -0800
From: "Albert V. Krebs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: THE AGRIBUSINESS EXAMINER#17
X-UID: 3700
--BF736C4536B5EE092DD147D0
The
AGRIBUSINESS
EX
> >(Don't worry, Max, I'll give you two days'
> > lead time if I have any exotic plans)
> >
we know your plans
Louis Proyect wrote:
> . As a stodgy old Marxist, I had become convinced long ago that
> the ruling ideas of society are those of the ruling class. Science was not
> immune.
>
COMMENT: Isn't this problematic? Although science is not immune from ruling class
ideas in certain respects, I thought
Interesting material on environmental reacism as well as pollutants in
general.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<77pchj$qa0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> . .
> . RACHEL'S ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH WEEKLY #633
Louis Proyect wrote:
>At the time, Doug was pro-Sokal but has shifted all the way in the other
>direction. His big complaint seems to be that Sokal knew nothing about
>Lacan and company, whom he sent up in his famous Social Text spoof.
>Meanwhile, my complaint about Alan Sokal has a different cha
> Does anybody recall where John Gurley published his famous essay on
> Maoism?
> Michael Perelman
a collection of Gurley's essays appear as _China's Economy and the
Maoist Strategy_ (1976), published by Monthly Review...included are:
"Maoist Economic Development: The New "Man" in the New China'
In December 1996, against my better judgement, I went up to Amherst,
Massachusetts for a conference sponsored by the journal Rethinking Marxism.
A nurse I knew from Nicaragua solidarity work had told me that she had been
to the last one and didn't understand a word they said. Someone had told me
o
