At 25/07/01 17:10 -0700, Michael wrote:
Besides that, he gives a positive mention of pen-l.
Ian Murray wrote:
For a sympathetic reading of the Autonomist zone of Marxism that
situates them [HN] and the last 25 years of
econ-eco-politico-history/theory in some great contexts and with
A student came up with the following.
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Monika Zwolak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fwd: Re: [PEN-L:15527] Re: Re: Nice quote
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Status:
Professor Needham,
The second quote is by Richard Douthwaite. Please see:
Does anyone know: are Nick Dyer-Witheford and Nick Witheford one person or two?
Tom Walker
Bowen Island, BC
604 947 2213
G'day all,
Yesterday, Australian Treasurer and Prime Minister-in-Waiting Peter Costello
gave a long and (inevitably) simplistic speech on the virtues and
inevitabilities of globalisation (I won't repeat it - you can pretty well
imagine it verbatim). Tonight Jamie Galbraith graced SBS TV's
Tom Walker wrote:
Does anyone know: are Nick Dyer-Witheford and Nick Witheford one
person or two?
I'm sure he's just him, Tom.
Oops, there I go with my anachronistic unified subject again ...
Cheers,
Rob.
Kananaskis:
Captain John Palliser, an early explorer of the valley, identified the area
by taking the name of a local Indian who had overcome some remarkable
circumstances. Palliser had written that he had heard of an Indian named
Kananaskis, giving account of most wonderful recovery from the
No, seriously. There is (or was?) a grad student then prof. in the
communications department at SFU named Nick Witheford. He was a skinny Brit
with black hair and was a marxist (or student of marx). The smiling photo of
Dyer-Witheford on his U of Guelph home page doesn't look exactly like the
G'day also,
Thanks to Rob for the summary of J. Galbraith' propositions.
There are some parts that I sincerely do not understand very well (e.g. what
Rob or James mean with Keynesian managed globalization -did such a thing
ever existed?). Anyway, I do not feel obliged to 'interpret' or
he is citing Keynes in the article.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 07:56:26AM -0400, W. Robert Needham wrote:
A student came up with the following.
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Monika Zwolak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fwd: Re: [PEN-L:15527] Re: Re: Nice quote
To: [EMAIL
Thanks for the reply, Alex.
Keynesian managed globalization -did such a thing ever existed?).
Well, Jamie called the quarter century after the War 'managed globalisation'
(or something very like it). I thought it an interesting characterisation,
too, but then, Keynes did talk to the Americans
Nobody intended for the tax cut to have a Keynesian
effect, even w/no spending cuts. If you're a
keynesian, it's too small ($40b this year) and
maldistributed. If you're not, its size is
irrelevant.
mbs
In any event, J. Galbraith is, IMO, right in stating that if behind a tax
cut there comes
Alex Izurieta wrote,
Less unlikely, but not highly probable either, would be a sort of
worldwide coordinated reflation.
But _given the alternatives_ doesn't the normal improbability of such a
response take on at least a more intense hue of possibility? The
institutional skeleton is there,
Why water is scarce now
Max Ortiz / The Detroit News July 25, 2001
Deb MacInnes uses a sprinkler set on low at Four Seasons Garden Center in Oak Park.
Natural and man-made factors have forced the first widespread restrictions since 1995.
Over-watering exposes pressure and capacity shortage
Tom Walker wrote:
Does anyone know: are Nick Dyer-Witheford and Nick Witheford one
person or two?
I'm sure he's just him, Tom.
Oops, there I go with my anachronistic unified subject again ...
Cheers,
Rob.
No thinker thinks twice; and to put the matter
What about glomming onto Bob Greenstein CBBP, projections with that
program #er crunchin' gizmo he has?
Michael Pugliese
- Original Message -
From: Max Sawicky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 8:20 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:15563] RE: Jamie Galbraith
As y'all can see from the headers, from one of the RW lists I'm on.
Michael Pugliese
- Original Message -
From: American Patriot Friends Network [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: APFN Yahoogroups [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
?
What about glomming onto Bob Greenstein CBBP, projections with that
program #er crunchin' gizmo he has?
Michael Pugliese
Tim Bousquet wrote:
The point I was trying to convey through the article
is that with a simple nod in the direction of workers'
rights, the local Supes could have done much for the
betterment of people. They didn't, for all sorts of
ideological reasons. It's very sad.
BTW I am not in
An ex-boyfriend (Lacanian) told me once that I, de-centered, and
fragmented him! I got a larf out of him by saying he was my, libidinal
cathexis.
Michael Pugliese
- Original Message -
From: Ian Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 9:06 AM
From the below, it sure looks as if the UK economic situation resembles
that of the US approximately a year ago:
Gordon, the fall guy
If the economy does nosedive, it will take Brown's prospects with it
Special report: global recession
Larry Elliott and Charlotte Denny
Thursday July 26,
BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS DAILY REPORT, THURSDAY, JULY 26, 2001:
RELEASED TODAY: The Employment Cost Index (not seasonally adjusted) for
June 2001 was 153.8 (June 1989=100), an increase of 3.9 percent from June
2000, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports. The Employment Cost Index
Does anybody have any comments about the front page story in the
Wall Street Journal today? They claim that consumer spending has
been holding up because people are increasing their debt by
refinancing their houses. In effect, the wealth effect is
forestalling the recession. If they are
At 02:53 PM 7/26/01 -0700, you wrote:
Does anybody have any comments about the front page story in the
Wall Street Journal today? They claim that consumer spending has
been holding up because people are increasing their debt by
refinancing their houses. In effect, the wealth effect is
wealth effects, wealth effects. first it was the stock market, now
refinancing real estate. I think what we need to develop is the idea of
not a wealth effect, but of Veblen-Duesenbury type debt-driven
standard- of-living maintenace effects. People simply are not about to
accept belt tightening,
for a good time, click on this: http://www.economy.com/default.asp
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
-Original Message-
From: Veneziani,R (pgr) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 06:05
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Bar-Isaac,H (pgr);
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Cruces,GA (pgr);
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Hay,J
Cc:
The "wealth effect" in housing is partially being stabilized by low interest rates; monthly mortgage payments are stable due to relatively lower interest costs that have helped buttress higher sales prices. Many lower income households are trying to buy homes due to skyrocketting rents which has
27 matches
Mail list logo
