deflation in China

2002-11-26 Thread Chris Burford
A diary contribution from Beijing in the Independent on Sunday (UK) notes that there are now 190 million mobile phones in China. This is tremendously important for a developing country in leaping over one of the steps in technological revolution, the need to lay telephone landlines. Secondly

China on world capital flows

2002-11-26 Thread Chris Burford
Without any mention of capitalism's tendency to unequal accumulation, the following is a subtle analysis in People's Daily of capital flows in the irrational international economic and trade system Clearly, unlike most developing countries, China intends not to be in a passive position in this

Left gets nod from right on copyright law

2002-11-26 Thread Bill Rosenberg
[IPR - 22.11.2002] Left gets nod from right on copyright law (CNet) U.S. Appeals Court Judge Richard Posner, one of America's most prominent jurists, warned Tuesday of an enormous expansion of intellectual-property law, adding a conservative voice to a chorus of criticism that's so far come

Aid to Israel, Turkey and Jordan

2002-11-26 Thread ken hanly
From Ha'arretz (sp?) Cheers, Ken Hanly Tuesday, November 26, 2002 Kislev 21, 5763Israel Time: 17:05 (GMT+2) U.S. expected to approve $14 billion aid request By Moti Bassok Israel will today submit a request for $14 billion in economic aid to U.S. National Security Advisor Condoleezza

Re: John Rawls

2002-11-26 Thread enilsson
RE It should be obvious that any philosopher who tried to revive the concept of the social contract would have little in common with Marxism, which posits social class as the fundamental unit of analysis. I have an admittedly imperfect understanding of Rawls, and perhaps others will set me

Re: Re: John Rawls

2002-11-26 Thread Louis Proyect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He was not claiming that we should look at actually existing societies as if they were the product of a social contract. Rather, Rawls asked what would society look like IF it was designed from scratch by people who did not know what position they would have in this

RE: Re: Re: John Rawls

2002-11-26 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:32564] Re: Re: John Rawls Eric N. wrote: He was not claiming that we should look at actually existing societies as if they were the product of a social contract. Rather, Rawls asked what would society look like IF it was designed from scratch by people who did

PK on NSR

2002-11-26 Thread Devine, James
Title: PK on NSR comments on cap-and-trade? November 26, 2002 Every Breath You Take Paul Krugman/NY TIMES Last week the Bush administration announced new rules that would effectively scrap new source review, a crucial component of our current system of air pollution control. This

Re: Re: Re: John Rawls

2002-11-26 Thread Thad Williamson
Rawls no doubt had a liberal welfare state in mind when he wrote A Theory of Justice but the difference principle itself does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that a liberal welfare state is the way to go. Even Rawls, who was initially very naive about actually existing economic systems

Re: PK on NSR

2002-11-26 Thread Bill Lear
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002 at 08:20:24 (-0800) Devine, James writes: comments on cap-and-trade? The following exchange is from Robin Hahnel. Bill Mon, 23 Feb 1998 20:08:24 -0500 Robin Hahnel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Max B. Sawicky wrote: If government gives away emissions permits, then

RE: the Krugman advantage

2002-11-26 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:32552] the Krugman advantage it's an okay article, but I sincerely doubt that PK will receive the Nobel Prize in economics. His NYT column is in some ways a consolation prize. Not only is PK controversial (doing a job that economists aren't supposed to do), but the new trade

RE: Re: John Rawls

2002-11-26 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:32570] Re: John Rawls Rawls' idea of justice came from the idea that one thinks about if I were to set up a society and didn't know what position I would end up in, how would I design it? The idea is that we should limit inequality because in this hypothetical situation, we

Re: RE: Re: John Rawls

2002-11-26 Thread Louis Proyect
Devine, James wrote: Rawls' idea of justice came from the idea that one thinks about if I were to set up a society and didn't know what position I would end up in, how would I design it? The idea is that we should limit inequality because in this hypothetical situation, we might end up with

Re: John Rawls

2002-11-26 Thread Michael Hoover
Eric N. wrote: He was not claiming that we should look at actually existing societies as if they were the product of a social contract. Rather, Rawls asked what would society look like IF it was designed from scratch by people who did not know what position they would have in this newly

Bush signs bill to protect insurance industry in future terror attacks

2002-11-26 Thread Nomiprins
This bill passed in the Senate 86-11. The Dems all waved it through. The 11 Republican dissenters included Phil Gramm who said the bill "discouraged development of a private terrorism insurance market" (something no economy should be without). It's win-win for insurance companies -- they can

Re: RE: FW: base-superstructure model

2002-11-26 Thread Carrol Cox
Forstater, Mathew wrote: [clip] vulgar materialism. David (M.) Gordon didn’t like this last phrase, by the way. I forget why, exactly. I thought Marx used it Marx spoke of vulgar economists, and both he and Engels, I _think_ spoke of mechanical materialism -- but I don't think either ever used

Fw: gw: Crops suffer as climate changes

2002-11-26 Thread Ian Murray
[speaking of cap and trade and insurance. from the Ecological Society of America list. ] - Original Message - From: Karen Claxon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:06 AM Subject: gw: Crops suffer as climate changes Crops suffer as climate

re: base-superstructure model

2002-11-26 Thread Devine, James
Title: re: base-superstructure model sometimes the phrase vulgar materialism is used to summarize Marx's 3nd thesis on Feuerbach: The [vulgar -- JD] materialist doctrine that people are products of circumstances and upbringing, and that, therefore, changed people are products of other

Re: John Rawls

2002-11-26 Thread enilsson
Jim D wrote, My point was that this seems pretty individualistic. It doesn't recognize that people care about the fates of others even without doing the putting myself in the other guy's shoes routine. Rawls artifical situation (where you didn't know what place you would have in the

Re: Re: RE: Re: John Rawls

2002-11-26 Thread enilsson
Louis wrote, The reason it sounds individualistic is because it is rooted in Kant. It is really an updating of the notion of the categorical imperative . . . and It was only after being exposed to Marxism that I figured out that it was nonsensical to talk about justice without talking about

RE: Re: John Rawls

2002-11-26 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:32578] Re: John Rawls Eric writes:This might be a possible assumption about how people would choose in this artifical situation, but I don't think this is the only possible assumption about how people would act and other possible assumptions about human motivations would

Stiglitz and the Baker Institute connection...

2002-11-26 Thread e. ahmet tonak
One of my students emailed me the following --an interesting mix!!! "In class, we recently discussed an article about US oil dependency and the upcoming war with Iraq. Frequently mentioned in the article was the Baker Institute for Public Policy. I took the liberty of researching who was on

RE: Stiglitz and the Baker Institute connection...

2002-11-26 Thread Brown, Martin - ARP (NIH/NCI)
So is the Baker Institure pro or anti-war? -Original Message-From: e. ahmet tonak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:35 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [PEN-L:32581] Stiglitz and the Baker Institute connection...One of my students emailed me

oil dependency

2002-11-26 Thread Devine, James
Title: oil dependency Ahmet quotes: In class, we recently discussed an article about US oil dependency and the upcoming war with Iraq. in case anyone was wondering about U.S. National Public Radio's stance on these issues, there was a story yesterday about France's and Russia's dependence

Re: RE: Stiglitz and the Baker Institute connection...

2002-11-26 Thread e. ahmet tonak
Brown, Martin - ARP (NIH/NCI) wrote: So is the Baker Institure pro or anti-war? Very pro-war. Here is the coverage from Sunday Herald (UK): Sunday Herald - 06 October 2002 Official: US oil at the heart of Iraq crisis By Neil Mackay

RE: Re: RE: Stiglitz and the Baker Institute connection...

2002-11-26 Thread Brown, Martin - ARP (NIH/NCI)
Oh, that Baker! -Original Message-From: e. ahmet tonak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:08 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [PEN-L:32584] Re: RE: Stiglitz and the Baker Institute connection...Brown, Martin - ARP (NIH/NCI) wrote:

Re: Re: RE: Stiglitz and the Baker Institute connection...

2002-11-26 Thread Ian Murray
- Original Message - From: e. ahmet tonak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:07 PM Subject: [PEN-L:32584] Re: RE: Stiglitz and the Baker Institute connection... Brown, Martin - ARP (NIH/NCI) wrote: So is the Baker Institure pro or anti-war?

John Rawls

2002-11-26 Thread Louis Proyect
NY Times, Nov. 26, 2002 John Rawls, Theorist on Justice, Is Dead at 82 By DOUGLAS MARTIN John Rawls, the American political theorist whose work gave new meaning and resonance to the concepts of justice and liberalism, died on Sunday at his home in Lexington, Mass. He was 82. The cause was

The underground press

2002-11-26 Thread Louis Proyect
It's Not Norman Mailer's Village Voice Anymore Muckraising And Hell-Raising: The Glory Days Of The Underground Press Are Gone by Michael Ryan Nowadays, alternative weeklies seem to exist mainly as a vehicle to advertise high end audio and computer equipment, health clubs, and sex toys...

Rawls and Kantian thinking

2002-11-26 Thread Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists, Eric Nilsson quotes Louis Proyect, LP, The reason it sounds individualistic is because it is rooted in Kant. It is really an updating of the notion of the categorical imperative . . . and It was only after being exposed to Marxism that I figured out that it was nonsensical