the WTO is irrelevant

2003-09-03 Thread Eubulides
[quite a novel spin...] http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/story.php?storyID=138141 Irrelevant WTO Protesters headed to CancĂșn in September for the World Trade Organization (WTO) meeting are wasting their time. But, then again, so are all the delegates. Why? Because the WTO doesn't actually do

political ecology of the labor process

2003-09-03 Thread Eubulides
[ New York Times ] September 4, 2003 Sick and Suspicious By BOB HERBERT SAN JOSE, Calif. - While I.B.M. officials deny it, evidence is being offered by stricken employees that unusually large numbers of men and women who worked for the giant computer corporation over the past few decades have bee

Re: Krugman on faux ferc fines

2003-09-03 Thread Sabri Oncu
Nomi: > PUHCA should not have been repealed. Doing so makes it > less likely any energy or utility company will focus on > low margin business like transmission. Stated differently, this goes back to what Diane was claiming. Electric power in transmission is a quasi-public good: High fixed cos

Re: Krugman on faux ferc fines

2003-09-03 Thread Jurriaan Bendien
What I still do not understand is how you can have a free market in electric power provision. What is "free" about it ? As far as I can see, electricity supply operates on the basis of a guaranteed market and a more or less monopoly position, from which consumers cannot withdraw, and in which they

Re: Krugman on faux ferc fines

2003-09-03 Thread Michael Perelman
>From a more unlikely source: Wessel, David. 2003. "A Lesson From the Blackout: Free Markets Often Need Rules." Wall Street Journal (28 August): p. A 1. "The blackout of 2003 offers a simple but powerful lesson: Markets are a great way to organize economic activity, but they need adult supervis

Re: Krugman on faux ferc fines

2003-09-03 Thread Devine, James
Nomi writes: >Right. Deregulation with a) more responsible federal oversight and b) a set of rules which would create a 'more robust transmission system' equals regulation, period.< I tell my students in Money & Banking that the regulation vs. deregulation debate is a snare and a delusion. Rather

Re: Krugman on faux ferc fines

2003-09-03 Thread nomi prins
Right. Deregulation with a) more responsible federal oversight and b) a set of rules which would create a 'more robust transmission system' equals regulation, period. There's no point in debating the free market argument for deregulation while condemning its results. Doing so plays into the hands

Wisconsin realtors a bunch of communists!

2003-09-03 Thread Anders Schneiderman
After reading the edifying posts from David about how liberals are essentially Communists, I thought I should let you all know about some more card-carrying members: the Wisconsin Realtors Association! Here is something from their newsletter, which I'd discovered courtesy of the Smart Growth Ne

Africans and the industrial revolution

2003-09-03 Thread Louis Proyect
(received from Rakesh) http://www.waado.org/NigerDelta/Documents/Slavery/SlaveryandDevelopment-Inikori.html Urhobo Historical Society "The Atlantic World Slave Economy and the Development Process in England, 1650-1850" By Joseph E. Inikori, Ph.D. University of Rochester, USA A paper presented at

Re: Krugman on faux ferc fines

2003-09-03 Thread Bill Lear
On Tuesday, September 2, 2003 at 22:04:44 (-0400) Michael Pollak writes: >... > There is a theoretical case for a deregulated electricity market. But > making such a market work, it's now clear, requires at least three > preconditions. First, it requires a robust transmission system, yet >