er, 1985). Sen's analysis
was reduced to a failure of purchasing power. (Maureen's
essay appears in Bernstein, et al (eds) The Food
Question, Monthly Review, 1990?).
I think there is an interesting story to be told about the
manipulation of ideas at high levels in the ruling
order. Who could be asked to tell it?
Ben Crow.
they would know
those who do.
Ben Crow
Stanford University.
social and historical context?
are they globally applicable?
Mainstream economics has answers to these questions with which
I beg to differ.
Ben Crow
Food Research Institute
Stanford University.
development of California was an economic
disaster).
Finally, a small point. I would be more open to David Faust's
argument that I misplace his theoretical leanings if he did not
cite primarily neopopulist texts in his list of references.
Ben Crow
Food Research Insitute
Stanford.
mentalists (and neopopulists more generally) from those who
argue that higher productivity (industrialization) is a pre-requisite
for higher living standards.
Ben Crow
Food Research Institute
Stanford.
equity and recognizes a wider range of
justifications for state intervention. A critical position
perhaps should not be a simple opposition because the report
represents this sort of advance on the austerity programs
of the 1980s.
Ben Crow
Food Research Inst
Stanford U.
equity and recognizes a wider range of
justifications for state intervention. A critical position
perhaps should not be a simple opposition because the report
represents this sort of advance on the austerity programs
of the 1980s.
Ben Crow
Food Research Inst
Stanford U.
s found in an Indian
government survey investigating why hill people did not attend
school: 'no aptitude for education' (64% were deemed to fall in
this category).
Ben Crow
Food Research Institute
Stanford University.
s found in an Indian
government survey investigating why hill people did not attend
school: 'no aptitude for education' (64% were deemed to fall in
this category).
Ben Crow
Food Research Institute
Stanford University.