no source of 'value' is
independent of our accumulation of technological knowledge.
OTOH, it might be argued, under a Marxian 'social theory
of value', that the status of labor as an *independent*
source of value is simply a formal abstraction, where the
empirical- scient
On Tue, 5 Nov 1996 13:49:01 -0800 (PST),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Bruce R. McFarling (hi, Bruce!) [Hi, Jim!] writes that:
>> One of the divisions between institutionalist economics
>> ... and Marxian economics has been the former's insistence
>> on multi-dime
DC governments are
exploiting the rural poor" line.[1]
Virtually,
Bruce R. McFarling, Newcastle, NSW
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[1] Oddly enough, the part that goes "therefore, these LDC governments
should stop interfering with the natural state of affairs and let wealthy
countries exploit th
fundamental innovation), but I'm not
aware of work in which it is elaborated.
Virtually,
Bruce R. McFarling, Newcastle, NSW
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[1] Antagonists in world-system arguments seem to be persistent in
labelling world-systems argument as "World-System Theory", but s
fundamental innovation), but I'm not
aware of work in which it is elaborated.
Virtually,
Bruce R. McFarling, Newcastle, NSW
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[1] Antagonists in world-system arguments seem to be persistent in
labelling world-systems argument as "World-System Theory", but s
th), that is, whether there are long waves, well Maybe
there is a bit of faith in any interpretation of long stretches of
history. But I'm trying to get a picture of the regulatory
mechanism that is unable to suppress cycles above a threshold
frequency cycles but successful at s
