Re: [PEN-L:9431] RE: Re: RE: Re: Shades of Summers

1999-07-22 Thread John M. Legge
Max and Brad may not know that, as far as the rest of the world goes, the US is the land of the three great cashectomies (append-, tonsill- and hyster-). Since only nutters would volunteer to be opened up and rearranged, this is doctor-initiated medicine and expense. Birth by Caesarean section is

Re: [PEN-L:9311] A Polemic against neo-liberal globalism

1999-07-20 Thread John M. Legge
See my web site for a review of Gray (and James Galbraith) John M. Legge http://www.users.bigpond.com/msn/jlegge/ - Original Message - From: Craven, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, 20 July 1999 6:51 Subject: [PEN-L:9311] A Polemic against neo-liberal globalism &g

Re: [PEN-L:9219] Re: Re: Re: Kant on Pain & Moral Worth

1999-07-16 Thread John M. Legge
I think that you (or Allen Wood) are confusing judicial doctrine with the more abstract concept of justice. People generally (neoclassically trained microeconomists being the most glaring exception) have definite ideas of "just" and "unjust" behaviour and situations and these are unlikely to be s

Re: [PEN-L:8915] Affirmative Action + Quotas against the Free Market + Meritocracy

1999-07-07 Thread John M. Legge
Yoshie, Meritocracy is no more than a cover word for racist practices. In the free (unregulated) market certain people and firms have power, competition being necessarily imperfect. Power will then be used to reward friends and punish enemies (profit maximising being both impossible and unch

Re: [PEN-L:8804] Re: punctuated equilibrium

1999-07-03 Thread John M. Legge
Gould is entertaining but not very rigorous. For a serious evolutionary model you must turn to Stuart Kauffman (e.g. Origins of Order). Kauffman introduces adaptive walks, the complexity catastrophe, and the evolutionary leap. All are endogenous. Paleontologically speaking, the dinosaurs' c

Re: [PEN-L:8373] Re: Re: Re: Thomas Friedman an economist?

1999-06-27 Thread John M. Legge
I thought that Lipsey and Lancaster had proved that near enough is not good enough: that a single false price may be as disruptive of the benefits of a perfect general equilibrium as a plethora of them. The economaniacs can't be satisfied with just pushing us towards a perfect world: nothing w