It is a bit hard to discuss anything after being unsubscribed. I will reply
with this next email address, then switch to the next in a list of fifteen,
once this one burns.
Moral: don't bother to unsubscribe me. It won't work. As to bandwidth, give
me a break. The total is about a few K. And I
Even now, I am probably being re-unsubscribed I will slip this in at high
speed. Michael, you are lucky I read two of your books. If I didn't respect
your work, you would be the victim of a melted marshmallow special.
A final note answering XAH, who didn't realize I couldn't reply.
The study of
Michael, I said I was done. AOL? This is an incredible overreaction, and I
would point out a few things to AOL myself. How about netzero? I even have
Kmart's Bluelight.com.
Chasing me away reflects badly on the list. Overposting on the eonic effect.
Nonsense. Three quarters of my posts were re
In a message dated 6/24/2001 4:34:14 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Nemonemini
writes:
Subject: Darwin was innocent--but wrong about history. Debriefing Historical
Darwinism
Comment on article below in Biomednet, "Darwin was innocent"
LINK: http://news.bmn.com/news/story?day=010622&story=1
The Eon
