Re: [Fwd]: [sixties-l] more on 'Steal This Movie'

2000-09-08 Thread Michael Hoover
> I realize that routine animation has been taken over by 3rd world > factories, but I know we had 3 well known animators in Winnipeg (I > think one was nominated for an academy award or at least the film > he worked on was). They (or one or two) were contracted by > Disney I believe to devel

Re: Re: [Fwd]: [sixties-l] more on 'Steal This Movie'

2000-09-07 Thread phillp2
he fund of the Manitoba Federation of Labour in which I have a small holding.) Paul Phillips, Economics, University of Manitoba From: Michael Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:[PEN-L:1422] Re: [Fwd]: [sixties-l] more on 'Steal This Movie' To:

Re: Re: [Fwd]: [sixties-l] more on 'Steal This Movie'

2000-09-07 Thread Brad De Long
> > >>From: Michael Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>"Steal this >> >>Movie" is indeed a stolen movie. It was stolen by NAFTA and is yet >> >>another example of an American cultural product purporting to be made >> >>in the US but in fact thrown together in the Canadian movie >> >>maquilado

Re: [Fwd]: [sixties-l] more on 'Steal This Movie'

2000-09-07 Thread Michael Hoover
> It is a lot cheaper to make films in Canada not only because of tax > breaks, something that the US of course never uses, but mainly > because labour costs (wages) and other filming costs (sets, etc.) > are much cheaper. > The high American $ is a major factor in all these > considerations

Re: [Fwd: [sixties-l] more on 'Steal This Movie']

2000-09-06 Thread Bill Burgess
It is rank nationalism. If the complaint was that film production is less unionized in Canada than in the US (I don't know if this is true) I could at least partly sympathize with the comment about skill levels, job loss, etc. Otherwise, it is a wonderful example of the arrogance that comes fr

Re: Re: [Fwd: [sixties-l] more on 'Steal This Movie']

2000-09-06 Thread Paul Phillips
Not a great deal Jim, particularly since all the major movie distribution chains in Canada are owned by the US (as well as the majority of TV stations) and they have always refused to show Canadian made films in the theatres because they don't attract big audiences because they aren't shown in

Re: [Fwd: [sixties-l] more on 'Steal This Movie']

2000-09-06 Thread Timework Web
Jim Devine asked: "what do pen-l's Canadian comrades think of this article?" I forwarded the rant to my new room mate who happens to be a steady-cam operator and an IATSE member. He laughed. Two factors he mentioned are more important than the government subsidies Everett fulminates about: 1. The

Re: [Fwd: [sixties-l] more on 'Steal This Movie']

2000-09-06 Thread Jim Devine
what do pen-l's Canadian comrades think of this article? >"Steal this Movie" -- > >From: Michael Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Even with its many flaws, which included terrible casting for the two >leads, I recommend this film as a sincere attempt at a biopic of Abbie >Hoffman -- an icon of the

[Fwd: [sixties-l] more on 'Steal This Movie']

2000-09-05 Thread Carrol Cox
Original Message Subject: [sixties-l] more on 'Steal This Movie' Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 11:20:17 -0700 From: radman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Steal this Movie" -- From: Michael Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Even with its many flaws,