Sid S. wrote;
>
> Are you serious about not seeing the difference between neoliberalism and
> "good old [postwar] capitalism"?
>
Yes. Of course there are differences, but I don't see the *significant*
difference implied by a position that replaces a traditional
committment to internationalism with a position where nationalist measures
are now seen as central to protecting working class interests (which I
understand to be your opinion).
What do you see as the main difference? Is it not that in the golden age
Capital could afford some concessions whereas since about the mid 1970s
labour productivity growth and real profitability have been stagnant, and
so Capital has had to become more aggressive ("brutal", as Bill R. put
it)?
Bill Burgess
