[COMMENT:  If it did not have such potentially disasterous consequences for
the labor movement, the series of denials reported here would be almost
comical.  According to these reports, no one did anything and no one knew
anything, except those three actually indicted.  So....If this were
happening to Clinton not Carey, or the GOP not the Dems, or the leadership
of the National Association of Mfgs. not the AFL-CIO, what would you think?
More to the point, I suspect that most folks already believe, "That's just
how politics works and everyone does it.  These schmucks just got caught."
How do you mount a national campaign for leadership of a union as large as
the IBT without raising tons of money; and if you do, how do you raise it
without losing your principles, scruples, and civic morality in the process?]
============================================
U.S. Says Carey Aides Used
DNC, AFL-CIO

Consultants Plead Guilty to Funneling
Money To Teamsters President's
Reelection Campaign

By Frank Swoboda and Sharon Walsh
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, September 19, 1997; Page A01
The Washington Post 

Federal prosecutors yesterday outlined a series
of schemes in which three political consultants
allegedly used various groups, including the
Democratic National Committee and the
AFL-CIO, to illegally funnel money to help
finance Teamsters President Ron Carey's
reelection campaign.

The three Carey consultants pleaded guilty to
charges they laundered Teamsters money for
the campaign. They also agreed to cooperate
with federal prosecutors investigating the
possible involvement of the DNC and other
union leaders, the U.S. attorney's office for the
Southern District of New York announced.

In documents filed in federal court in
Manhattan, the U.S. attorney's office said DNC
and AFL-CIO officials participated in the
schemes. DNC officials have said they did not.
**************************************************
Steve Langdon, a DNC spokesman, said last
night: "No plan to receive Teamster
contributions in exchange for donations to the
Carey campaign was approved by the DNC. If
any action was taken, it was without the
authorization of the DNC leadership."
**************************************************
AFL-CIO spokeswoman Denise Mitchell said
the federation is aware of the transaction in
question but can't find anything in it that
suggests wrongdoing. "We can't rule out the
possibility that we were used as part of the
scheme, but according to the U.S. attorney
nobody at the AFL-CIO is a target of the
investigation, and I think that says something,"
she said.
***************************************************
White House special counsel Lanny J. Davis
said, "As we have previously stated, as far as
we can determine no one in the White House
participated in or had anything to do with the
alleged plan."
***************************************************
Prosecutors did not allege any wrongdoing by
Carey, whose narrow reelection victory over
rival James P. Hoffa was thrown out earlier this
month by federal election officials. Carey, who
was first elected to the job in 1992 on a pledge
to reform the union, has insisted that he had no
knowledge of the illegal financing operations
and said he is cooperating with the criminal
investigation.

Pleading guilty yesterday were Carey campaign
manager Jere Nash, political consultant Martin
Davis and Michael Ansara, a telemarketing
official involved in the campaign. As part of their
plea agreement the three men also agreed to
pay a total of nearly $1 million in fines, which
will be used to help pay the cost of a new
Teamsters election.

U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White said all three had
waived indictment, had pleaded guilty and were
cooperating with the government in its
continuing investigation of last year's
Teamsters election. Their sentencing has been
postponed while they cooperate with
authorities. Davis faces up to 15 years in
prison; Nash, up to 10 years; and Ansara, up to
five years. White said at a news conference,
"The defendants have victimized both the
International Brotherhood of Teamsters and the
election process." Referring to the Teamsters'
past, she said, "This is not organized crime, but
the crimes are very serious and galling ones."

The list of people involved in the case could be
lengthy, according to a 10-page statement
issued by White outlining the case against the
three men.

In the document, prosecutors said Davis and
Nash, along with the union's director of
government affairs, were involved in a scheme
to try to help finance the Carey campaign
through the DNC. She said an unnamed official
of both the DNC and the Clinton-Gore
reelection committee agreed to seek
contributors to the Carey campaign in exchange
for Teamsters donations to the DNC.

The DNC identified at least one foreign donor
who agreed to give $100,000 to the Carey
campaign, according to prosecutors. But the
Carey campaign rejected the money because
the donor was an employer and federal law
prohibits employers from contributing to union
elections.

The prosecutors also said Davis and Nash told
them "large sums of money, including cash,
were raised by officials of various labor unions
for the Carey campaign." It is illegal for union
officials of one union to make contributions in
the election campaign of another union.

AFL-CIO President John J. Sweeney and
Richard Trumka, the federation's
secretary-treasurer, have both appeared before
the federal grand jury investigating the
Teamsters election, the AFL-CIO has
confirmed.

Although not named, Trumka is mentioned by
title in another alleged scheme outlined by
prosecutors. According to the document, Davis
and Nash said they and the union's director of
government affairs had arranged for the
Teamsters to contribute $150,000 to the
AFL-CIO. They said "the secretary-treasurer of
the AFL agreed with Davis to transfer the
$150,000 to Citizen Action [a labor-backed
lobbying group] which then gave Davis
$100,000 which he used to pay for the Carey
campaign's direct mail fees."
**************************************************
Attorneys for Citizen Action could not be
reached for comment.
**************************************************
Another scheme outlined by the prosecutors
involved the National Council of Senior
Citizens. According to prosecutors, Davis and
Nash arranged through the union's director of
government affairs for the Teamsters to make a
contribution to the National Council for Senior
Citizens and then arranged to have the council
hire the November Group, a direct-mail firm,
headed by Davis. Davis then applied a portion
of the money he received from the council to
the Carey campaign.
****************************************************
Attorneys for the seniors council could not be
reached for comment. The prosecutors did not
****************************************************
name the Teamsters' director of government
affairs, but the job was held by William H.
Hamilton Jr., who resigned from the union in
July. Hamilton said at the time that he didn't
"knowingly" do anything wrong. He also said
then that he would not cooperate further with
the grand jury investigation. Neither Hamilton
nor his attorney could be reached late
yesterday.

Nash and Davis are expected to be interviewed
in the next few days by Barbara Zack Quindel,
the federal election officer who overturned
Carey's election. Quindel is now deciding
whether Carey should be disqualified from
running in the new election. Government
sources described Davis as the "hub" in the
investigation.

In a statement, Carey congratulated
prosecutors for their action against the three
political aides. "Today's Teamsters union has
no quarter for illegal schemes like these. We
will continue to assist authorities in exposing
corruption and wrongdoing no matter who is
involved," he said.

Reid H. Weingarten, Carey's attorney, said
Carey has cooperated with the investigation
and has been told by the government that he is
not a target of the probe. "Ron Carey is not
implicated in any way by today's charges,"
Weingarten said. "Indeed, he and the union are
the victims of the wrongdoing described by the
government. . . . Today's events will not deter
Mr. Carey's continuing efforts to reform the
Teamsters and improve the lot of working men
and women."

Hoffa, in a statement from his Detroit
headquarters, said that as a result of today's
actions "Ron Carey should finally do the right
thing and step down rather than bring further
embarrassment to himself and the Teamsters
union."

"If he's unwilling to do so," Hoffa added, "he
should be involuntarily removed from office."

Prosecutors said the Carey campaign became
concerned in July 1996, the time of the
Teamsters convention in Philadelphia, "that
Carey's lead over Hoffa was narrowing" and
that Hoffa was raising substantially more money
than Carey for the election. As a result, they
said, Davis and Nash decided they needed a
$700,000 direct-mail effort. The two men,
according to prosecutors, agreed that the
Carey campaign would raise $300,000 and
Nash, whose November Group would be doing
the mailings, would raise the other $400,000.

Prosecutors said Davis and Ansara "devised a
scheme whereby wealthy nonemployers would
donate money to the Carey campaign, and, in
exchange, the [Teamsters] would contribute
money to `get-out-the-vote' efforts that would
assist the political candidates and causes
supported by those wealthy individuals."

"Nash agreed to participate in this scheme and
the [Teamsters] government affairs director
agreed to make the appropriate contributions . .
.. so long as the contributions were sufficiently
consistent with the [Teamsters'] objectives that
they could be justified if scrutinized,"
prosecutors said.

Contributions from the wealthy benefactors
were made to an organization set up by the
campaign known as Teamsters for a Corruption
Free Union, according to the prosecutors. They
said the Teamsters would contribute "several
dollars" for each dollar received from one of
these wealthy contributors.

Prosecutors said Citizen Action, a consumer
and environmental advocacy group, helped a
wealthy individual recruited by Ansara to obtain
$185,000 from donors to the Carey campaign.
In return, the prosecutors said, the Teamsters
donated $475,000 from the union's general
treasury to Citizen Action and $175,000 to
another organization that was not named. The
money donated to the Carey campaign was
then used to help pay for the direct mailings,
according to prosecutors.

Swoboda reported from Washington; Walsh
reported from New York City. 

  © Copyright 1997 The Washington Post
===============================

Business Leaders Gear Up 
Lobbying and Ad Campaign
for `Fast-Track' Bill

By Terry M. Neal
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 19, 1997; Page A04
The Washington Post 

To counter a fierce lobbying effort by organized
labor, business leaders are planning to spend
at least $2 million on an air and land war to
persuade Congress to broaden President
Clinton's trade negotiating powers.

But even as the advertising campaign began
yesterday, coalition members acknowledged
they were playing catch-up to the union forces
that vehemently oppose the measure. Some
members of Congress who support "fast-track"
authority for the president expressed concern
yesterday that the business lobby had fallen
dangerously behind the curve on an issue that
could be decided by a handful of votes.

"Most of the members are saying they haven't
heard anything from business," said Rep.
Robert T. Matsui (D-Calif.), a fast-track
supporter and ranking member of the Ways and
Means Committee, where the bill has been
assigned for markup. "Then you wonder: How
much does the business community want fast
track? How important is it to them?"

Fast track empowers the president to negotiate
international trade agreements that Congress
cannot amend, only vote up or down. The battle
is largely between organized labor on one side
and Clinton and big business on the other.

America Leads on Trade, a coalition formed to
lobby for the authority, insists the issue is a top
priority for business. The group plans a
television campaign in about 30 targeted
markets across the country as well as a
grass-roots effort.

At a news conference Wednesday, James T.
Christie, chairman of the 543-member coalition,
refused to divulge how much it is spending and
which congressional districts it is targeting. But
yesterday a coalition official revealed the $2
million figure and said more resources would be
readily available if necessary.

"The philosophy of America Leads on Trade is,
we're going to match dollar for dollar what the
opposition spends," said the official, who
requested anonymity. "We are keeping close
tabs on the opposition and are monitoring what
they do. And we are flexible to respond to their
advertising buys."

On Tuesday, AFL-CIO President John J.
Sweeney announced a multimillion-dollar
television and radio campaign, initially aimed at
13 congressional districts and the entire state
of California. The targeted members are
undecided on the issue, and most won their
seats by small margins and come from areas
with a strong labor presence. The ads provide
a toll-free number for constituents to call their
lawmakers.

AFL-CIO officials said the media campaign
would cost $1 million in the first week alone.
Legislative director Peggy Taylor said: "The
dollar for dollar doesn't matter. We have the
ability to mobilize tens of thousands of working
families in states and congressional districts all
over the country."

Unlike big business, organized labor has been
active for months, personally lobbying members
and coordinating grass-roots efforts in
members' districts. The business lobby has
been particularly deficient in making personal
contacts on Capitol Hill, sources there said.

"They need to get out of their offices downtown,
go to the Hill and wear down some shoe
leather," said a Democratic staff member who
specializes in trade issues.

Johanna Schneider, a spokeswoman for the
Business Roundtable, said there is a good
explanation: Business leaders decided to hold
off intense lobbying until they could see
Clinton's bill. That bill was released Tuesday
after several delays.

She noted that the Roundtable -- a key member
of America Leads on Trade -- sent two dozen
CEOs of large companies to lobby on the Hill
earlier this month.

Thomas J. Donohue, president of the U.S.
Chamber of Commerce, acknowledged that
labor is riding high from the successful strike
against UPS, but vowed that big business will
not be a patsy.

"These guys [labor] play political hardball, and
they have staked their political reputation on it
[fast track]," Donohue said. "So you are going
to get one hell of a fight here."

The America Leads on Trade source said the
television campaign is targeted at 103
congressional districts -- 35 Democrats and 68
Republicans. Television ads started running in
the D.C. area yesterday. They will begin today
in markets including Seattle, Denver, Phoenix,
Dallas, Los Angeles, Tampa and Jackson,
Miss.

Forty-eight other Democrats have been
targeted for grass-roots lobbying. Business
officials, elected leaders and others from their
districts will be calling members to urge support
for fast track.

Some members of Congress have been caught
in the cross-fire. Among those with opposing
television ads running in their districts: Reps.
David E. Skaggs (D-Colo.), Phil English (R-Pa.)
and Thomas C. Sawyer (D-Ohio).

Skaggs said his office had received 57 phone
calls from both sides on the issue in the last two
days. He said he will announce his position
today at a news conference in his district.

"I don't know that this is the heaviest lobbying
I've seen in my 11 years here," Skaggs said.
"But I think it would be fair to say this is the
heaviest full-court press this year."

Staff writer Steven Pearlstein contributed to this
report. 

  © Copyright 1997 The Washington Post



Reply via email to