Thank you, Robert Naiman, for a well reasoned letter in an increasing confused
world.

Henry C.K. Liu

Robert Naiman wrote:

> Open letter to Gennady Zyuganov
>
>         from a Jewish leftist in the U.S.A.
>
> Gennady Zyuganov
> Russian Communist Party
>
> Dear Brother Zyuganov,
>
> Greetings. I hope my letter finds you in good health.
>
> Allow me to address you as an American Jewish leftist, as one with great
> concern over the suffering of Russias people, and also as one deeply
> concerned with the suffering of the Arab peoples of the Middle East, indeed
> as one who has brought medicine to Iraq in violation of the U.S. embargo and
> who was imprisoned by the Israeli authorities in February 1996 for
> attempting to nonviolently obstruct the demolition of a Palestinian home by
> Israeli authorities, and who remains to this day barred from Israel by the
> Israeli government.
>
> Let me begin my letter by expressing my deep regret for the destructive role
> that the United States, through its military, economic and political
> policies, has played in Russia, particularly for the role of the U.S., the
> IMF, and USAID in supporting "shock therapy" for the Russian economy, which
> has caused so much suffering for the Russian people.
>
> While I continue to be saddened by the suffering of the Russian people, I
> have been heartened by the recent moves of the Russian government to
> "declare independence" from the IMF and the U.S. and return to economic
> policies more attuned to the interests of the Russian people than to the
> interests of international banks and multinational corporations.
>
> However, I was quite dismayed to read recent press reports that you have
> recently and publicly attacked the role of "Zionist capital" in Russia,
> accusing it of "ruining Russias economy."
>
> I hope that these reports are not accurate. If they are not, please accept
> my apologies and my hope that in the future, you will bear in mind how your
> remarks may be distorted in the Western media and choose your words more
> carefully.
>
> If these reports are accurate, however, I must vigorously protest. Your
> remarks are being interpreted in the West a thinly veiled anti-Semitic
> attack. Sadly, I must agree with this assessment. In making these remarks,
> not only do you do a great disservice to the Jews of Russia, who must surely
> feel less safe today knowing that the head of the Russian Communist Party is
> willing to engage in anti-Semitic diatribes, you also do a great disservice
> to all those who struggle for more economic justice in the world and to all
> those who support the just demands of the Palestinian and Arab peoples for
> self-determination.
>
> That you do a disservice to the Jews of Russia, by making an issue of the
> religious or ethnic background of some of the clique around Yeltsin instead
> of attacking them for their specific activities, I think is obvious. That
> you do a disservice to those who support economic justice and Arab and
> Palestinian self-determination may not be so obvious to you, so let me
> attempt to explain.
>
> To begin, I hope that you would agree that the opinions of the
> newspaper-reading public in the United States are a matter of great import
> for the world. It should not be so; in a just and more perfect world, power
> would be more evenly distributed, the U.S. would not be able to push other
> countries around so much, and so the opinions of Americans would not matter
> so much. But while we should all work to reduce the power of the U.S.
> relative to other countries, for the foreseeable future U.S. policy will
> have a great impact.
>
> Now, I would not claim that we in the U.S. democratically control the U.S.
> government. Clearly this is not the case; our democracy is rather imperfect,
> to say the least. Nonetheless, public opinion does have some impact.
> Consider the Vietnam War as an example. The war continued long after it was
> deeply unpopular in the U.S. Nonetheless, popular protest shortened the war
> and thus saved many lives. More recently, activists opposed to the policies
> of the IMF succeeded in blocking the Clinton Administrations request for
> more money for the IMF in the U.S. House of Representatives. While the IMF
> eventually got the money through a backroom deal, we believe that this
> battle significantly weakened the IMF politically and contributed to the
> somewhat increased flexibility the IMF has shown recently, at least in Asia.
>
> I assume you are aware that for many years Yeltsin and his clique have been
> portrayed in the West as "democrats " and "reformers," who are only opposed
> by "remnants of the Stalinist regime" and "extreme nationalists." (The term
> "nationalist" in this context has the connotation not of those who defend
> the general public against the interests of foreign powers but of those who
> promote ethnic hatred and xenophobia to advance their political careers. )
> With this portrayal, increasingly at odds with reality as you know, the U.S.
> government was able to maintain public support for its destructive policy of
> supporting Yeltsin at all costs and destroying the Russian economy.
>
> I hope you will see then, that by making comments like this you play into
> the hands of Russias worst enemies, foreign powers who would destroy
> Russian industry and make Russia a Third World vassal of the United States,
> exporting raw materials and importing industrial goods. Comments like this
> allow the U.S. government to portray those who oppose the rule of Russia by
> the U.S., the IMF, and foreign corporations as Jew-haters and racists. I
> would not be surprised to find out that U.S. State Department officials were
> secretly delighted by your remarks.
>
> Similarly, and perhaps more importantly for the fate of the world, your
> remarks do a great disservice to those of us who are working, against
> formidable odds, to change U.S. policy in the Middle East. Perhaps Russia
> will be able to find its own way even in the face of U.S. opposition.
> Perhaps Russia, with its nuclear weapons, can cancel its foreign debt and
> expel the IMF without fear of a U.S. military attack. The Arabs of the
> Middle East have no such security. Every day they live under the threat of
> U.S. military intervention, as we have seen demonstrated again so recently.
> As you know, more than a million Iraqis have died as a result of the
> U.S.-maintained economic embargo.
>
> You must know that those who support the current U.S. policies in the Middle
> East, and those who support the policies of the Israeli government which
> since 1948 has expelled Palestinians, confiscated their land and destroyed
> their houses, you must know that these forces have benefited tremendously
> from the lie that those who oppose their policies are anti-Jewish. I know
> that you said in your letter that you are not anti-Jewish. But when you use
> the term "Zionist" to refer to the activities of Jewish capitalists in
> Russia, you conflate two unrelated things to the detriment of both
> criticisms. Unless you have specific evidence that they are connected, which
> you are then obligated to place before the world, you should keep separate
> your criticism of the activities of capitalists in Russia, however
> nefarious, from your criticism of colonialists in the Middle East. If you
> fail to make this separation, your criticism of "Zionists" in Russia will be
> interpreted -- correctly -- as anti-Semitism and your criticism of "Zionism"
> in the Middle East will be dismissed as anti-Semitic as well, at least in
> the West.
>
> Lastly, Brother Zyuganov, I would ask you a question. If your remarks lead
> many Jews in Russia to feel more insecure, and if this insecurity leads more
> Russian Jews to emigrate, and if some of these Jews emigrate to Israel, and
> if the Israeli government settles these Russian Jews on land and even in
> houses that it has stolen from Palestinian Arabs; then, Brother Zyuganov,
> exactly whose interests have you served?
>
> Im sure, Brother Zyuganov, that you would be alarmed to discover that your
> criticism of "Zionism" had in fact made you an "objective ally of Zionism."
>
> Brother Zyuganov, I wish you peace and prosperity in the New Year and the
> same for all the peoples of the world. Lchaim.
>
> Robert Naiman
> 1744 Kalorama NW
> Washington, DC 20009



Reply via email to