BECAUSE EVERY STRUGGLING GRAD STUDENT NEEDS SOMETHING TO ASPIRE TO....
Philosophy and Literature announces Winners of the Fourth Bad Writing Contest
(1998)
Full text at http//www.cybereditions.com/aldaily
We are pleased to announce winners of the fourth Bad Writing Contest
sponsored by the scholarly journal Philosophy and Literature.
The Bad Writing Contest celebrates the most stylistically lamentable passages
found in scholarly books and articles published in recent years. Ordinary
journalism, fiction, departmental memos, etc. are not eligible, nor are
parodies entries must be non-ironic, from serious, published academic
journals or books. Deliberate parody cannot be allowed in a field where
unintended self-parody is so widespread.
Two of the most popular and influential literary scholars in the U.S. are
among those who wrote winning entries in the latest contest.
Judith Butler, a Guggenheim Fellowship-winning professor of rhetoric and
comparative literature at the University of California at Berkeley,
admired as perhaps "one of the ten smartest people on the planet,"
wrote the sentence that captured the contest's first prize. Homi K. Bhabha,
a leading voice in the fashionable academic field of postcolonial studies,
produced the second-prize winner.
"As usual," commented Denis Dutton, editor of Philosophy and Literature,
"this year's winners were produced by well-known, highly-paid experts who
have no doubt labored for years to write like this. That these scholars must
know
what they are doing is indicated by the fact that the winning entries were all
published by distinguished presses and academic journals."
Professor Butler's first-prize sentence appears in "Further Reflections on
the Conversations of Our Time," an article in the scholarly journal Diacritics
(1997)
"The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to
structure social relations in relatively homologous ways to a view of
hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and
rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of
structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes
structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insights
into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of
hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the
rearticulation of power."
Dutton remarked that "it's possibly the anxiety-inducing obscurity of such
writing that has led Professor Warren Hedges of Southern Oregon University to
praise Judith Butler as `probably one of the ten smartest people on the
planet'."
This year's second prize went to a sentence authored by Homi K. Bhabha, a
professor of English at the University of Chicago. He writes in The Location
of Culture (Routledge, 1994)
"If, for a while, the ruse of desire is calculable for the uses of discipline
soon the repetition of guilt, justification, pseudo-scientific theories,
superstition, spurious authorities, and classifications can be seen as the
desperate effort to "normalize" formally the disturbance of a discourse of
splitting that violates the rational, enlightened claims of its enunciatory
modality."
This prize-winning entry was nominated by John D. Peters of the University of
Iowa, who describes it as "quite splendid enunciatory modality, indeed!"
Ed Lilley, an art historian at the University of Bristol in the U.K.,
supplied
a sentence by Steven Z. Levine from an anthology entitled Twelve Views of
Manet's "Bar" (Princeton University Press, 1996)
"As my story is an august tale of fathers and sons, real and imagined, the
biography here will fitfully attend to the putative traces in Manet's work of
"Les noms du p=E8re," a Lacanian romance of the errant paternal phallus ("Les
Non-dupes errent"), a revised Freudian novella of the inferential dynamic of
paternity which annihilates (and hence enculturates) through the deferred
introduction of the third term of insemination the phenomenologically
irreducible dyad of the mother and child."
Stewart Unwin of the National Library of Australia passed along this gem from
the Australasian Journal of American Studies (December 1997). The author is
Timothy W. Luke, and the article is entitled, "Museum Pieces Politics and
Knowledge at the American Museum of Natural History"
"Natural history museums, like the American Museum, constitute one decisive
means for power to de-privatize and re-publicize, if only ever so slightly,
the realms of death by putting dead remains into public service as social
tokens of collective life, rereading dead fossils as chronicles of life's
everlasting quest for survival, and canonizing now dead individuals as
nomological emblems of still living collectives in Nature and History. An
anatomo-politics of human and non-human bodies is sustained by accumulating
and classifying such necroliths in the museum's observational/expositional
performances."
The passage goes on to explain that museum fossils and artifacts are "strange
superconductive conduits, carrying the vital elan of contemporary biopower."
It's demonstrated with helpful quotations from Michel Foucault's History of
Sexuality.
Finally, a tour de force from a 1996 book published by the State University
of New York Press. It was located by M.J. Devaney, an editor at the
University
of Nebraska Press. The author is D.G. Leahy, writing in Foundation Matter the
Body Itself.
Total presence breaks on the univocal predication of the exterior absolute
the
absolute existent (of that of which it is not possible to univocally
predicate
an outside, while the equivocal predication of the outside of the absolute
exterior is possible of that of which the reality so predicated is not the
reality, viz., of the dark/of the self, the identity of which is not outside
the absolute identity of the outside, which is to say that the equivocal
predication of identity is possible of the self-identity which is not
identity,
while identity is univocally predicated of the limit to the darkness, of the
limit of the reality of the self). This is the real exteriority of the
absolute outside the reality of the absolutely unconditioned absolute
outside
univocally predicated of the dark the light univocally predicated of the
darkness the shining of the light univocally predicated of the limit of the
darkness actuality univocally predicated of the other of self-identity
existence univocally predicated of the absolutely unconditioned other of the
self. The precision of the shining of the light breaking the dark is the
other-
identity of the light. The precision of the absolutely minimum transcendence
of the dark is the light itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of
existence for the first time/the absolutely facial identity of existence/the
proportion of the new creation sans depth/the light itself ex nihilo the
dark
itself univocally identified, i.e., not self-identity identity itself
equivocally, not the dark itself equivocally, in "self-alienation," not "self-
identity, itself in self-alienation" "released" in and by "otherness," and
"actual other," "itself," not the abysmal inversion of the light, the reality
of the darkness equivocally, absolute identity equivocally predicated of the
self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the reality of this
darkness
the other-self-covering of identity which is the identification person-self).
Dr. Devaney calls this book "absolutely, unequivocally incomprehensible."
While she has supplied further extended quotations to prove her point, this
seems to be more than enough.
************************************************
The next round of the Bad Writing Contest, results to be announced at the end
of 1999, is now open. There is an endless ocean of pretentious, turgid
academic prose being added to daily, and we'll continue to honor it.
Prof. Denis Dutton
Editor, Philosophy and Literature University of Canterbury,=20
Christchurch, New Zealand
Phone 011-643-348-7928
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
