At 10:48 AM 2/9/99 -0500, Charles Brown wrote:
>Overall, I just wish the Europeans had had more respect for the indigenous
societies, because I think  our species would be better off with a wider
variety of cultures, and preservation of the knowledge and cultural
treasuries of the indigenous peoples. I would like to see the whole range
of human cultural types, modes of production , from history preserved so
that maybe even part of basic education would be for children to live and
learn them, reiterating cultural evolution , so to speak. There may have
been knowledge of many natural medicines, herbs and "spices", which are now
lost. Also, our gungho technological development regime could use some of
the Indian philosophy of ecological harmony. It is perhaps wishful thinking
now, but I would like to see more of a synthesis of the wisdoms of various
phases of human development, rather than obliteration of the socalled
primitive ways of life.
--snip---


Sounds like a great idea to me as well.  I just have one little problem,
who would live in those "reservations" of pre-modern life?  The
reservations as we know them may be tourist attractions, but they are also
breeding grounds for poverty and hopelessness.

PS.  When I was in Mexico City I was surprised at the level of integration
of the pre-Columbian and European cultures.  For Mexicans, the history of
their state does not start with a decree signed by a few white
property-owning men but goes back to the Aztec times.  Mexicans (at least
those whom I met) see their national identity as a mixture of the Aztec and
the Spanish culture.

I see such integration, even if largely symbolic, a better way of
preserving the past, than relegating it to reservations, as practiced in
this country.  BTW, how many Americans would describe their national
identity as a mixture of different European, Asian and Native cultures?
Based on what I've seen it is mostly "England, England ueber alles."

Regards,

Wojtek



Reply via email to