------------ forwarded message ------------

The Confederation des syndicats nationaux (Confederation of National Trade
Unions representing 220 000 workers in the Province of Québec) have
published a number of studies to help local unions negociate reductions in
working time. The table of contents of these documents are available on our
web site:

http://www.csn.qc.ca/Pageshtml2/Rech.html
 
If you are interested, I could send you a copy of these research papers.
 
In a nut shell our position goes like this:
1) reduction in work time is not a panacea but can contribute to maintain
and create employment and distribute work more equitably within society;
2) work time should not be considered  only on a daily , a weekly or an
annual basis but on the whole active lifespan of workers;
3) there is no one big way to reduce work time, such as the 4 day week.
There are dozens of changes that are possible to the regulation of work time
(vacation, reduction of overtime, leave with or without out pay for a number
of reasons, progressive retirement, early retirement, voluntary part-time of
limited duration, paid holidays etc etc) but the particular demands unions
make must a) correspond to the aspirations of the workers; and b) must  be
adapted to the realities (work organization for example) of each workplace
if they are to be efficient in creating jobs. (For example one extra week of
vacation in a service industry is not the same thing as one week extra
vacation in a manufacturing plant operating 7 days a week, 24 hours a day.
In the first example there would be minor or no job creation since workers
on vacation are usually not replaced ; in manufacturing, they are.
4) on the wage compesation issue, at it's 1994 National Congress our
organization voted a resolution which says that whwn negociating the
reduction of work time unions should pursue the objective of protecting the
purchasing power of the workers. This means that when negociating workers
must take into account a certain number of elements: 
1) compensation must be paid for productivity increases resulting from the
decrease in work time or to changes in the organization of work accompanying
the reduction of work time;
2) the decrease in the marginal tax rate which, in a progressive personnal
income tax system, makes the after tax income decrease less than the
before-tax income (for example a 10% decrease in before-tax income can
result in a 7%-8% reduction in take home pay;
3) the fact that the reduction in work time can sometimes reduce workers
expenditures tied to their work. For example a four day work week
necessitates less expenditures than a five day work week (transport,
clothes, restaurant, baby-sitting, etc);
4) finally we have to take into account the fact that more time away from
work, to be with the family, to read a good book, to participate in
community affairs or political affairs or just  relax is valuable to people.
A lot of people would consider that the price to pay for one day of free
time per week  is reasonable if it  costs 20$, 30$, or 40$ on their weekly
paycheck . The cost is even more reasonable if the final outcome is more
jobs for the community. For lower salaried workers of course this position
cannot hold. Unions must protect  and increase the purchasing power of low
salaried workers. Also the reduction in working time must be an occasion to
convert involuntary part time and temporary employment into full time and
regular employment.
 
We think that this way of seeing things, although more difficult and
engaging than the usual "reduction with full compensation" slogan which
hasn't been too successful since the mid 1970's, can be more productive in
the work place. This is more so  if the outcome is more jobs. It means
linking the reduction in work time to changes in the way work is organized
and it means an occasion to democratize the organization of work. It
involves real solidarity (not just discourse) between workers who have a job
and workers who don't. It gives more time for people to engage in community
building  and political action.
 
Any comments would be appreciated.
 
François Aubry
Research Department
Confédération des syndicats nationaux
1601 De Lorimier
Montréal (Québec)
514-529-4995
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ------- end forwarded message -----------



Regards, 

Tom Walker
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
#408 1035 Pacific St.
Vancouver, B.C.
V6E 4G7
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(604) 669-3286 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The TimeWork Web: http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/



Reply via email to