A United Nations report says that the last 15 years have seen a
   tremendous growth in wealth for some side by side with an
   "unprecedented decline" for others.
   
   In the top 15 industrialized countries, there has been a dramatic
   surge in economic growth since 1980, according to the UN's Human
   Development Report 1996.
   
   "Over much of this period, however, economic decline or stagnation has
   affected 100 countries, reducing the incomes of 1.6 billion people,"
   the report says.
   
   "In 70 of these countries average incomes are less than they were in
   1980--and in 43 countries less than they were in 1970. Over 1990-93
   alone, average incomes fell by a fifth or more in 21 countries." This
   last drop was mostly in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.
   
   The UN study finds that "the world has become more polarized, and the
   gulf between the poor and rich of the world has widened even further."
   
   
   Some facts the UN study finds are:
     * The poorest 20 percent of the world's people saw their share of
       global income decline from 2.3 percent to 1.4 percent in the past
       30 years.
     * The assets of the world's 358 billionaires exceed the combined
       annual incomes of countries with 45 percent of the world's people.
     * During the last 30 years, the proportion of people with negative
       per-capita income growth tripled.
     * In the 1980s, the socialist countries of Eastern Europe and the
       Soviet Union did much better economically than all but a handful
       of countries. But after the return of capitalist exploitation,
       these countries "suffered steep declines in per capita
       income-which fell on average by a third from the peaks in the
       mid-1980s."
          
   The report's stark picture is a virtual condemnation of capitalism.
   Though that is not its authors' conclusion.
   
   The report offers many suggestions on what could be changed in order
   to eliminate what is called the "rich-poor gap." But it does not say
   how these suggestions might be instituted. That's because it can't.
   
   Because the report fails to clearly indicate that capitalism is the
   source of the problem, it cannot offer the only possible solution: the
   elimination of capitalism.
   
   Karl Marx, in his classic study of the workings of capitalism, showed
   that the conditions of capitalist production can produce great wealth
   only by also creating grinding poverty. He said, in fact, that this is
   an "absolute general law" of capitalism. (Capital, Vol. 1, p. 644)
   
   Marx was not saying, as some argued at the time, that capitalism would
   force the real wages of the workers to decline more and more. This has
   not happened, though even the highest-paid workers are vastly poorer
   than the wealthy ruling class.
   
   The law of capitalism Marx found is that there is an absolute
   impoverishment of a section of the working class that the capitalist
   system throws out of the production process: the chronically
   unemployed, the elderly, disabled persons, etc. These are the
   permanent poor who have no chance of coming out of poverty.
   
   This poverty pulls down the living standards of the entire working
   class. The permanent poor serve as a reserve labor force-workers who
   are forced to accept any wage, no matter how low, in order to escape
   this grinding poverty. This pressure is used to drive down wages for
   all workers.
   
   Capitalism has never been able to eliminate poverty. It has not
   eliminated poverty either in the United States or around the world.
   Capitalism not only creates a permanent layer of poor people, but
   there is also the periodical impoverishment of workers hit by
   corporate downsizing, layoffs, cutbacks, and wage reductions.
   
   Capitalism's failure to eliminate poverty is proof of its bankruptcy.
   It is an outdated economic system.
   
   Revolutionary socialism remains the best answer.
   
                Workers World, August 1996


Shawgi Tell
University at Buffalo
Graduate School of Education
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to