There was no report Weds. and this double issue today.  I have never 
seen this before.   Hmmmm ....

-----------

BLS DAILY REPORT, WEDNESDAY AND THURSDAY, DECEMBER 4-5, 1996

RELEASED ON THURSDAY:  Revised annual rates of productivity changes in 
the third quarter were:  0.0 percent in the business sector; -0.3 
percent in the nonfarm business sector; and 6.3 percent in 
manufacturing.  In the business sector, productivity was unchanged as 
a 2.1 percent output increase was accompanied by a nearly equal 
increase (2.0 percent) in the hours of all persons engaged in the 
sector.  Similarly, labor productivity in the nonfarm business sector 
fell as hours of all persons rose 2.1 percent, but output grew only 
1.8 percent.  In manufacturing, output rose at a 5.6 percent rate, and 
hours fell 0.7 percent ....

The U.S. economic landscape remained largely unchanged in November, 
with the Federal Reserve's 12 district banks generally reporting 
moderate growth and tight labor markets, but no generalized wage gains 
and still stable prices ....(Daily Labor Report, Dec. 5, page D-1; 
Washington Post, page D2).

Index of forward-looking economic indicators edged up 0.1 percent in 
October, its ninth straight monthly gain, the Conference Board reports 
....(Daily Labor Report, Dec. 4, page D-1; Washington Post, page F2).

This week's "Trendlines" in the Washington Post, is "Fine-Tuning a 
Leading Index," which says, "One easily calculated number, the spread 
between interest rates charged on overnight loans and yields on 
10-year U.S. Treasury notes, has considerable power to predict 
economic growth."  On Dec 30, "that spread officially becomes one of 
the components of the index of leading economic indicators.  When the 
yield on the notes is well above overnight rates, growth is likely to 
be healthy.  When the spread turns negative, recession often follows 
...."

The median wage increase due in 1997 under contracts negotiated in 
earlier years -- 3 percent -- is the same deferred median reported for 
1996, data compiled by BNA show ....(Daily Labor Report, Dec. 4, pages 
2,D-2).

Though working families are saving one-third more towards retirement 
than they were two years ago, it may be too late for older workers, 
says a survey sponsored by the Employers Council on Flexible 
Compensation and Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Company ....(Daily 
Labor Report, Dec. 4, page A-6)_____Working Americans are saving more 
for retirement, but not nearly enough to achieve the income they want, 
a Marketing Research Institute survey found ....(Washington Post, page 
F1).

A Washington Post (Dec. 4) op-ed page column, "The Squeeze on 
Statistics," by Robert J. Samuelson, says that accurate numbers are 
society's eyes and ears.  We can't afford not to know them ....

CPI REPORTS FROM WEDNESDAY

Anticipating the release of a Senate commission report likely to say 
the CPI overstates inflation, BLS Commissioner Abraham lists the steps 
the agency has taken already to adjust for an upward bias in the 
measure ....The most significant revision Abraham mentions will take 
effect with the February 1998 release of January 1998 price data. 
 Every 10 years, BLS comprehensively updates its marketbasket of goods 
and services.  In this revision, 1993-95 consumer spending patterns 
will replace 1982-85 patterns.  Additionally, BLS updates each year, 
on a rotating basis, 20 percent of the goods and services priced for 
the index.  "We have estimated that updating weights may reduce 
measured inflation by 0.1 percent or 0.2 percent per year," Abraham 
says ....(Daily Labor Report, pages 1,AA-1,E-4).

Five-member panel of economists will tell Congress that the CPI 
overstates inflation by 1.1 percent, according to sources ....(Daily 
Labor Report, page AA-2).

The Clinton administration signaled its willingness to consider 
proposals to significantly scale back the annual cost-of-living 
adjustment used to set payments for federal benefit programs and 
determine income tax brackets for hundreds of millions of Americans. 
 Senate Republicans also expressed interest in the idea, but make it 
clear they would not move on any proposal without ironclad assurances 
of White House support because of the political volatility of the 
issue ....At a press briefing on some of the technical issues likely 
to be raised in the commission's report, Commissioner of Labor 
Statistics Katharine G. Abraham said she had not received a copy and 
declined to comment on what changes in the CPI it might recommend. 
 Abraham acknowledged that the CPI is not a "perfect" measure of 
changes in the cost of living because it does not take into account 
how consumers change their buying behavior when prices of some goods 
and services rise more rapidly than others.  That shortcoming means 
there is an upward bias in the CPI, she acknowledged, but she said the 
extent of that bias is not known.  If Clinton officials are genuinely 
interested in encouraging a broad debate about the accuracy of the 
CPI, one difficulty will be figuring out a way to do it so that it 
does not appear to put pressure on or imply criticism of the 
economists at the BLS ....(Washington Post, page F1).

CPI REPORTS FROM THURSDAY

The Advisory Commission To Study the Consumer Price Index proposes 
that the federal government create a new inflation measure that is 
closer to a "true cost-of-living" index.  In the final report of the 
panel chaired by Michael Boskin, the group also finds that the current 
CPI overstates inflation by about 1.1 percentage points a year, a 
finding that caps a two-year effort to review the price measure's 
accuracy.  The commission makes separate recommendations to BLS and to 
Congress and the president on how to deal with concerns over the CPI. 
 Lawmakers say they want to deal with the issues as they relate to tax 
indexing; now Congress and the Clinton administration must grapple 
with the budget implications of the panel's recommendations.  A 
special report by BNA looks at several sides of the CPI debate:  the 
Boskin panel's findings, policy implications, changes the BLS has 
already made to the index and is planning, and reaction of private 
data users to the debate ....(Daily Labor Report, page 1).

The panel finds that the government has been overestimating inflation 
for years ....Fixing that arcane statistical mistake, as urged by the 
group, would raise tax payments, slow the rise in federal benefits, 
and ripple in many other ways through the economic lives of millions 
of Americans in coming years.  But not all experts agree on the 
details of the alleged mistake, or on the desirability of fixing it as 
the panel proposed, or on changing the index so as to reduce the 
annual cost-of-living adjustments to Social Security benefits, tax 
schedules, and more ....Some of the panel's recommendations were 
immediately challenged by officials at BLS ....BLS Commissioner 
Abraham questioned the commission's detailed proposals for dealing 
with the substitution problems ... in a statement ....(Washington 
Post, page A1).

A Washington Post editorial, "The Inflation Rate, the Budget ... ," 
ends with this paragraph:  "Back to the president and Congress.  The 
last thing they can want to do is order the BLS to publish a statistic 
it doesn't believe in.  The inflation rate ought not be the result of 
a political decree.  Flog the agency to try to improve the index, yes; 
put pressure or even the hint of pressure on it to reach a particular 
result, no.  And no index is ever going to be a silver bullet or a 
substitute for political judgment and will.  The advisory panel may 
well be right.  It's a serious group that has made a serious 
contribution.  But if the politicians think on this or some other 
basis that the current system of annual adjustments is too generous, 
they need finally to be the ones to step up and ratchet it back.  They 
can make whatever arguments they like, but they must be the ones to 
take the responsibility.  We hope they do."

Economists' endorsement of lowering the consumer price index boosts 
the chances of a balanced budget deal ....(Washington Post, page D1).

DUE OUT TOMORROW:  The Employment Situation:  November 1996

                  MORE CPI STORIES TOMORROW


Reply via email to