Shawgi Tell;

What is modern Communism? Extremely interested in how it got their also.

Bob malecki

>Why is it that not a day goes by without the bourgeoisie attacking
>communism, through its media, think-tanks, universities and in a
>million and one other ways? If communism is "finished," "dead,"
>"utopian," "dictatorial," "totalitarian," "the antithesis of human
>rights" and any number of other colorful epithets which come to
>mind, what are imperialism and the bourgeoisie worried about?     
> The real issue is that imperialism and the bourgeoisie can only
>continue to keep themselves in power so long as the working class
>and all the forces in society which stand to gain from coming to
>power themselves are confused about the significance of what is
>going on in the society and their consequent line of march.      
>The aim of the ideological and political confusion-making of the
>bourgeoisie is to ensure that the workers, women, youth, students
>and others do not seriously think about the causes of the problems
>as they exist in the society and how to deal with them. The
>bourgeoisie makes communism and the communist party the targets of
>its attack because they are the main instruments of
>enlightenment and of the new arrangements which are required to
>open society's path for progress. 
>   Modern Communism is the profound revolutionary condition for the
>complete emancipation of the working class and all of humanity, in
>which people are the creators of their own history. It emerges out
>of the concrete conditions of capitalism in which production is
>social but appropriation is private. It is this contradiction
>between the character of production and the means of its
>appropriation which is accentuating the contradiction which is
>tearing the society apart - the contradiction between the
>productive forces and the old moribund relations of production. The
>condition of Modern Communism comes into being after a
>thoroughgoing resolution of this contradiction. The stage of
>socialism is the transition period between capitalism and
>communism. But imperialism and the reactionary bourgeoisie present
>Modern Communism as if it is a set of lunatic principles
>conjured-up and imposed on the objective world by self-serving
>power hungry maniacs or utopians who are simply out of tune with
>the "harsh realities" of life
>     In other words, without Modern Communism the workers and
>people cannot find their bearings. The bourgeoisie does not want
>people to embrace communism and the communist party for no other
>reason than to keep them disoriented and unable to direct the
>strength of their numbers and organization in a manner which
>benefits them, not the bourgeoisie.
>
>
>Shawgi Tell
>University at Buffalo
>Graduate School of Education
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>




Reply via email to