See Item #1.  It is my impression that productivity is strongly 
procyclical, and thus an unreliable measure, at least in many of the 
purposes for which it is used.  Does anyone have specific information 
on this?
Dave

----------

BLS DAILY REPORT, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1997

RELEASED TODAY:  BLS reported preliminary productivity data -- as 
measured by output per hour of all persons -- for the fourth quarter 
and for the full year 1996.  In the fourth quarter, productivity 
advanced 2.4 percent in the business sector as output grew 5.8 percent 
and hours worked rose less -- 3.4 percent (seasonally adjusted annual 
rates).  In the nonfarm business sector, productivity rose 2.2 percent 
as output increased 5.9 percent and hours grew 3.7 percent ....

The U.S. economy will remain on a moderate-growth path with low 
inflation, buoyed by consumer spending that is supported by high 
income growth and consumer confidence, the Economic Report of the 
President said ....(Daily Labor Report, page A-9)_____The CEA in its 
annual report to Congress lauded the nation's current combination of 
low unemployment and low inflation and said that it could continue 
more or less indefinitely.  If the council's analysis is correct, it 
would mean that the Fed might be able to leave short-term interest 
rates at their current level for a long time to come, barring some 
sort of outside shock to the economy ....The key point, the CEA said, 
is that the unemployment rate associated with a stable inflation rate 
... has come down substantially since the 1980s ....(Washington Post, 
page D1)_____The report contends that the gap between rich and poor in 
America appears to have stopped widening and may have reversed 
....While other reports in the last year, from the Census Bureau and 
the University of Michigan, have shown a widening disparity between 
rich and poor Americans, the council found that the poorest 20 percent 
of households had the biggest income gains of any of the five 
percentiles between 1993 and 1995 ....Still, the council cautioned 
that the latest figures might prove to be only a pause rather than the 
start of a trend ....(New York Times, page D1)_____In its report, the 
CEA says a plan to put Social Security funds in the stock market 
"raises concerns about risk" no matter whether the government or 
individuals are doing the investing ....(Wall Street Journal, page 
A2)_____A little inflation can be a good thing, the annual report says 
in an argument that appears aimed at discouraging Fed policymakers 
from raising interest rates ....(Washington Times, page B10).

Obsolete industrial categories are revamped in the U.S. government's 
recently completed overhaul of the Standard Industrial Classification 
(SIC) code.  An effort to put a $6 trillion economy into a series of 
orderly boxes, the SIC codes are put to a wide range of uses, from the 
compilation of key national economic statistics to determining 
regulatory burdens and tax rates ....The two-year revision was done 
for two primary reasons, said Jack Triplett, former chief economist 
for BEA and head of the three-nation committee that designed and 
approved the changes.  The first and most obvious reason was the age 
and relative uselessness of the old code ....The second reason behind 
the revision was to match the U.S. code with those in Canada and 
Mexico in order to meet guidelines outlined in NAFTA.  As a result, 
the new code is called the North American Industry Classification 
System ((NAICS)

The caption for a chart in Business Week (Feb. 10, page 6) says 
there's a long-running dispute over whether productivity growth is 
anemic or the government's measures are flawed.  So economist Edward 
Yardeni looked at a proxy for productivity, the inflation-adjusted 
growth of sales per employee at companies in the Standard & Poor's 500 
index.  By that measure, productivity is booming.

Trouble ahead in the battle to contain labor costs -- companies can no 
longer rein in benefits to offset pay raises, says an article in 
Business Week (Feb. 10, page 29) ....If wages climb, so will benefits. 
 That's because about 60 percent of all benefits -- including paid 
leave, overtime pay, defined contributions to pension plans, and 
social security payments -- are tied to wages.  In fact, every dollar 
increase in hourly pay lifts the bill for these benefits alone by 
about a quarter.  Moreover, the tab for health care is beginning to 
outpace overall benefits growth.  According to a survey by benefit 
consultant Foster Higgins Inc., health-care costs may rise 4 percent 
in 1997, after a 2.5 percent increase in 1995.  In the past, 
businesses cut health-care costs by switching to health-maintenance 
organizations ....But with the market now saturated, HMOs will have a 
harder time attracting new customers.  So, premiums for existing 
members will start to rise, says the article ....

The Advisory Council on Social Security's consensus that a deficit is 
inevitable rests on gloomy growth assumptions about population and 
labor force growth that aren't shared by other government forecasters, 
says Business Week (Feb. 10, page 92) ....The projections used by the 
council are based on calculations by the Social Security Board of 
Trustees, a government oversight body ....They're also difficult to 
square with historical trends, says the article.  Howard Fullerton, 
described by Business Week as an economist in charge of long-range 
forecasting at BLS, is quoted as saying, "The trustees are paid to be 
pessimistic, but the effect is to make people believe that Social 
Security isn't viable" ....Of course no one can forecast 75 years out, 
and the trustees may well turn out to be right ....Fullerton thinks 
labor force growth won't sink as dramatically as the trustees foresee 
....

DUE OUT TOMORROW:  Major Work Stoppages, 1996






Reply via email to