BLS DAILY REPORT, TUESDAY, MARCH  4, 1997

__The National Association of Purchasing Management reports that 
growth in the manufacturing sector was buoyed in February by gains in 
new orders and production, and prices paid for raw materials jumped 
for the third month in a row ....On the inflation front, prices paid 
by manufacturers continued to rise, and supplier delivery times 
slowed, a development that bears watching by the inflation-wary 
Federal Reserve, money market economists said.  Manufacturing 
employment, on the other hand, declined for the third consecutive 
month, leading some economists to revise their expectations for 
February's employment report ....(Daily Labor Report, page A-5).
__Activity among American manufacturers improved in February from a 
month earlier, as orders and production accelerated ....(New York 
Times, page B8).
__The manufacturing sector is sending a few inflationary signals but 
they are still fuzzy and faint ....(Wall Street Journal, page A2).

__Total personal income increased 0.3 percent in January, while 
consumer spending climbed 0.7 percent, the Commerce Department 
reports.  The January increase in spending is the largest since a 0.9 
percent gain in October ....Wages and salaries-- which account for 
about 57 percent of total income -- edged down 0.1 percent in January 
after increasing 0.1 percent in December.  A January decline in 
average weekly hours more than offset advances in employment and 
average hourly earnings ....(Daily Labor Report, page D-1).
__The Commerce Department said that January's increase in income was 
inflated by special factors, including cost-of-living increases for 
federal programs like Social Security and pay increases for civilian 
and military personnel.  Without the special factors, personal income 
increased less than one-tenth of 1 percent ....(New York Times, page 
B8).

Construction spending rose 0.4 percent in January, not quite reversing 
the previous month's decline, the Commerce Department reports.  Gains 
came from industrial and office construction, along with construction 
of apartment buildings ....(Daily Labor Report, page A-5).

President Clinton gave his aides the go-ahead to try to forge a deal 
with Congress to reduce cost-of-living adjustments for Social Security 
and other benefit programs, White House officials said.  The officials 
said the administration had not decided on a specific proposal, but 
would start consulting with members of Congress from both parties, as 
well as with outside economists, to find a bipartisan way of dealing 
with the issue, which could determine the success of efforts to 
balance the budget ....The officials said the administration would 
float several ideas, including the creation of a commission to make 
nonbinding recommendations ....They said the emphasis would be on 
trying to create a panel that would have technical credibility on a 
subject that is complex even for economists.  The administration would 
prefer a panel whose members do not already have strong views on the 
subject so that their work did not appear rigged to find budget 
savings at the expense of benefit recipients ....(The New York Times, 
page A16).

An editorial in Saturday's New York Times, "A Rational Way to Reduce 
the Deficit," says:  "To fix the problem, Congress need not tamper 
with the actual computation of the [CPI] index, which is produced by a 
professional, nonpartisan staff at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 
 Instead it could forthrightly acknowledge that the official measure 
is exaggerated, that a reliable measure is not yet available and that 
it will make a reasonable correction for the purposes of adjusting 
Federal spending and tax programs ...."

Michael J. Boskin responds in the New York Times' 
letters-to-the-editor to an op-ed article (Feb. 27) by Joel Popkin.







Reply via email to