Louis:

ALL RIGHT, EVERYBODY LISTEN UP. THE ONLY THING I ACCUSED NOAM CHOMSKY AND 
MIKE ALBERT OF IS ATTACKING MARXISM. TO THIS CHARGE THEY HAVE ALREADY PLEAD 
GUILTY. CASE CLOSED.

I AM SATISFIED AT THIS POINT, UNTIL I HEAR EVIDENCE TO THE 
CONTRARY, THAT MARKET-SOCIALISM, WHICH ALBERT DOES OPPOSE, IS LIKE 
POSTMODERNISM: SNAKE-OIL POPULAR AMONG ACADEMICS WHO WANT TO FEEL 
'RADICAL' WHILE ENJOYING THE STATION AND PRIVILEGES ASSOCIATED WITH TENURE.

A FEW MONTHS FROM NOW I WILL TAKE A LOOK AT CHOMSKY'S ANARCHISM AND ALBERT'S 
POSTMARXISM. UNTIL THEN, DON'T BRING THEIR NAMES UP TO ME AGAIN.


On Mon, 16 Oct 1995, Rhon Baiman wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, 11 Oct 1995, Louis N Proyect wrote:
> 
> > Save your energy, Mikey, we're going to have a great debate later on. By the 
> > way, I have people like Paul Sweezy, Harry Magdoff, Ellen Meiksins Wood, 
> > David Harvey, Leo Panitch, etc. in my corner (figuratively). 
> > I believe an ideological fight has been brewing for some time now. You 
> > should have heard Harry Magdoff duking it out with Frank Roosevelt and 
> > David Belkins at the Brecht Forum the other night. Harry called "market 
> > socialism" an industry in the same way post-modernism is. I don't think 
> > ideas like postmodernism, Mondragonism, market socialism, etc. can be 
> > harmonized with the ideas of the Communist Manifesto, State and Revolution, 
> > etc. It's about time that we sorted these matters out.
> > 
> 
> Louis,
> 
>       As someone who has been debating David Belkins for some time, you 
> should know that Albert and Hanhel are among the most vigrous anti market 
> socialists around and certainly opposed to Belkin and Roosevelt.  I also 
> think they've done brilliant work in this area particularly their book 
> on "The New Revolution in Welfare Economics" though I have some doubts 
> about the feasability of their precise socialist model - I myself lean 
> toward some modifications a la pat Devine and David Laibman. This is just 
> to give you an idea that their is a lot of overlap between "Marxists" and 
> A&H who do not at all discount Marxism as I unmderstand them.
> 
>       In any case good luck! Hopefully this will be constructive.
> 
>       In Pen-L Solidarity,
> 
>       Ron Baiman
>       Roosevelt Univ.
> 
>       Chicago
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to