Re: [PEN-L] Re: My one and only reply to Levy

1997-11-02 Thread Gerald Levy
Stephen E Philion wrote: > Think of it like this. Maurce Dobb and Paul Sweezy had a very lively > debate in the 1950's. Their views were largely irreconcilable, yet > neither party ever sunk to telling the other one "to go back to school to > learn (fill in th eblank)..." Brenner and Wallerst

Re: [PEN-L] Re: My one and only reply to Levy

1997-11-02 Thread Gerald Levy
Stephen E Philion wrote: > This is the problem Jerry. You say you are critical of Malecki, yet you > have never spent any energy criticizing this guy, Where do you get your information from? Just recently, I criticized him publicly (and repeatedly). > Lou's sin was simple and he apologized fo

Re: [PEN-L] Re: My one and only reply to Levy

1997-11-02 Thread Stephen E Philion
jerry, On M-I and Pen-L you have singled out Doug for your bitter attacks. I subscribe to these two lists and have not seen you attack anyone else with such bitterness. As Michael Yates and James Devine have pointed out, your criticisms are especially vitriolic, which this list is not supportiv

Re: [PEN-L] Re: My one and only reply to Levy

1997-11-02 Thread Stephen E Philion
On Sun, 2 Nov 1997, Gerald Levy wrote: > > LNP didn't (and doesn't) like Bob Malecki. Well, OK ... he's not exactly > my favorite person either. But, Proyect decided that since he didn't like > Malecki (a personal grudge), he would [try to] chase him off of cyberspace > by maliciously claiming th

[PEN-L] Re: My one and only reply to Levy

1997-11-02 Thread Gerald Levy
Louis Proyect wrote: > >becoming a pro-management snitch). > Levy, I was going to ignore this as I used to ignore your ravings on the > Marxism-International mailing-list. I think most people on PEN-L are > starting to form the same sort of impression of you that people already > have on the Spoo