RE: [PEN-L] Re: income & race

1997-11-05 Thread anzalone/starbird
le of the A-A >>community is gaining in comparison to all workers, just like high >income >>earners overall, the lower four quintiles are also gaining (at least in >>appearances) because of increasing hiring trends toward occupational >>categories that are proportionally more rep

RE: [PEN-L] Re: income & race

1997-11-04 Thread anzalone/starbird
because of increasing hiring trends toward occupational >categories that are proportionally more represented by African >Americans. However, the gains in the lower quintiles are likely to be >over-shadowed by greater costs associated with work-related >expenditures. > >Regards, > &

RE: [PEN-L] Re: income & race

1997-11-03 Thread anzalone/starbird
n up on Doug's BLS statistics in the first place? Its a puzzle to me. ellen > >Jeff Fellows > > -- >From: Gerald Levy >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [PEN-L] Re: income & race >Date: Sunday, November 02, 1997 4:52PM > >Ellen (anzalone/starbird) wrote: >

RE: [PEN-L] Re: income & race

1997-11-03 Thread Fellows, Jeffrey
. The declingin social safety nets may be pushing proportionally more minorities into the paid labor market. Of course, increasing earnings among former social support recipients doesn't mean they are monetarily better off. Jeff Fellows -- From: Gerald Levy To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

[PEN-L] Re: income & race

1997-11-02 Thread Gerald Levy
Ellen (anzalone/starbird) wrote: > Is it true that inmates incarcerated in prison are NOT counted as > households in your data? To be counted as being employed or unemployed in the US data, one must first be counted as being part of the labor force. But, the labor force is defined in such a way