From the heartland

2002-02-25 Thread Max Sawicky
http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthtribune/news/opinion/2741000.htm

Re: From the Heartland

2002-01-24 Thread Tom Walker
Max wrote,   > That still leaves the heap o' work.  -- mbs Having conquered the lump o' labour, the heap o' work should be a piece o' cake. Here are four non-exhaustive suggestions for things that need to be done:   A comprehensive, cross-referenced, annotated bibliography on economics and h

RE: Re: From the Heartland

2002-01-23 Thread Max Sawicky
You're right. Now is a good time to talk about it. That still leaves the heap o' work. -- mbs I agree with you, Max, that the best time to raise the Time issue is when the economy is in good shape. The problem then, however, is that no one is worried much about unemployment and so it is off t

Re: From the Heartland

2002-01-23 Thread Tom Walker
I agree with you, Max, that the best time to raise the Time issue is when the economy is in good shape. The problem then, however, is that no one is worried much about unemployment and so it is off the political agenda. I recall you specifically making that comment to me in this forum, oh, a

Re: From the Heartland

2002-01-23 Thread Tom Walker
Gene Coyle wrote,   > We should take umbrage at anything over 3.0.   I take umbrage where ever I can find it.     Tom Walker

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: From the Heartland

2002-01-23 Thread Eugene Coyle
We should take umbrage at anything over 3.0. Gene Coyle Max Sawicky wrote: > Well-taken, but if people start to care about the unemployment > rate, then it becomes important, indicators be damned. Now > that we've seen 4-oh, we should take umbrage at anything over > 5.0. > > mbs > > > The Conf