>CBC Radio   As It Happens 6.30 pm  Wednesday August 15 2001
>Interview by Terry McLeod
>Interviewee  Amanda Tadura, Elizabeth Fry Society (Sudbury)
>
>(Barbara Budd) ... Kimberly Rogers was under house arrest in her apartment
>in Sudbury, Ontario. Rogers, who was 9 months pregnant was found dead in
>that apartment on Thursday night. Some people blame the Ontario government
>for her death.  One of those people is Amanda Tadura. She works with the
>Elizabeth Fry Society in Sudbury and we reached her there.
>
>Terry McLeod:
>Can you tell us briefly how Kimberly Rogers came to be under house arrest
>in the first place.
>
>AT:
>She was charged or pleaded guilty to defrauding Social Services by
>accepting an OSAP loan.
>
>TMc:
>What's an OSAP loan?
>
>AT:  Ontario Student Assistance ... when you go to college, you can get
>loans from the government.
>
>TMc:
>Ok. So she accepted this loan. How much money was it?
>
>AT:  I believe it was above $40,000 ... it was for three or four years
>College.
>
>TMc:
>I see, and she was collecting welfare at the time? And what's the problem
>with that under Ontario law?
>
>AT:  She was no longer eligible for welfare once she had taken Ontario
>student loans.
>
>TMc:
>So what happened then when her welfare was cut off?
>
>AT:  Her welfare was cut off when she pleaded guilty to the charge. She was
>placed under 9 months of house arrest and her penalty at the time was
>suspension of benefits for 3 months ... now if you are charged with the
>same offence it's a lifetime suspension.
>
>TMc:
>So she then was sentenced to house arrest for 9 months ...
>
>AT:  At the same time her benefits ceased.
>
>TMc:
>So what source of income did she have during that 3 months when her welfare
>was cut off?
>
>AT:  That's when she contacted Elizabeth Fry.  I don't think she really
>realized the situation she got herself into until the rent was due, there
>was no food in the house, her medication was discontinued because that was
>her only prescription plan.
>
>TMc:
>Medication for what?
>
>AT: Anti depressants for depression.
>
>TMc:
>So she was suffering from depression?
>
>At:  Hm-hm.
>
>TMc:
>So her benefits were suspended for 3 months and what happened after that?
>
>AT:  Well, community agencies here in Sudbury started working together -
>unfortunately we could provide things like baby clothes and food but we
>couldn't get any money so we went to Community Legal Aid and they took the
>case down to Toronto. It was represented by a Toronto law firm and a
>charter challenge was put into effect whereby she was reinstated benefits
>until the court case in September.
>
>TMc:
>So she got her welfare benefits back ...
>
>AT:
>Right ... back, yeah.
>
>TMc:
>And was she living on those welfare benefits when she died?
>
>AT:
>Yes.
>
>TMc:
>Did you visit her during this difficult time?
>
>AT:
>Many many times because being under house arrest meant she was only allowed
>out for 3 hours a week. This was one of the few situations where I went to
>the client's home and drove her to the doctor's ... things like that ...
>and basically did grocery shopping for her and then drive groceries to her
>house.
>
>TMc:
>You mean the house arrest sentence required her to be in her home all the
>time except for 3 hours a week.
>
>AT:
>She was allowed out 3 hours a week.
>
>TMc:
>What effect did this house arrest have on her?
>
>AT:
>I think she was starting to withdraw. At the beginning she phoned a lot
>more, she needed a lot more support. I took it in a sense as a positive
>side ... that she was maybe becoming more connected with her family and she
>was ... but I also think she was withdrawing and her pregnancy was not ...
>it was a difficult pregnancy for her.
>
>TMc:
>How far along was this pregnancy when she died last Thursday?
>
>AT:
>Well Kim said 8 1/2 months ...
>
>TMc:
>What's known about the cause of the death?
>
>AT:
>Nothing at this time. I don't believe it was heat exhaustion. That's been
>ruled out, but I don't know.
>
>TMc:
>Why do you mention heat exhaustion?
>
>At:
>Because her place was so, so hot and because she couldn't ... the rest of
>us, during this heat wave ... we made for the lake or something right? But
>her place was very hot and she was literally stranded there.
>
>TMc:
>And was Sudbury suffering through that heat wave of last week as well?
>
>AT:
>Oh yes. It was tough.
>
>TMc:
>What effect did it have on her?
>
>AT:
>I think it just made her quite ill ... just spiritually and physically ill.
>It was hard. And any woman in the later stage of pregnancy would have found
>that heat wave difficult and to be isolated, stuck in that little house
>[note: 2nd floor apartment]
>and afraid of the future  ... She was a very strong woman to have gone
>through what she did and still have hope for the future, and the baby.
>
>TMc:
>Who do you hold responsible for her death?
>
>AT:
>... legislation that is put into effect without looking at the
>repercussions, you're talking about a baby here too ... not just a mother
>... a baby.
>
>TMc:
>Which legislation are you talking about?
>
>AT:
>The one that has been imposed about the welfare bans and the current one
>for life ...
>[ban on welfare receipt].  Let's take a look at house arrest. What does
>house arrest mean? Who is responsible for Kimberly? She's still in custody.
>When she's on house arrest, she's still in custody per se, you know ... and
>house arrest. So I think that needs to be looked at more.
>
>TMc:
>How could the provincial government in Ontario have better handled this case?
>
>AT:
>More supervision. More supervision. There's a woman who had no income
>coming in and placing her under house arrest with basically no roof over
>her head. None of the shelters could have taken her here. They didn't look
>at the situation. They make these rules and this legislation ... they have
>no idea what it's like for people who have no income and are living so
>marginally. They don't realize. Then they complain because they are
>breaking laws or they are working the streets or stuff like that. You know?
>Reality. Get out there and look at what's really going on.
>
>TMc:
>She fought back against this legislation. Do you feel that her efforts
>against it and now perhaps her death may in the end have achieved something?
>
>AT:
>There was a good chance she was going to win the charter challenge. There
>was a good chance of it. There were other people coming forward who had
>been put on the lifetime ban who were going to offer their support and tell
>their stories. Well ... unfortunately now I don't think it's going to go
>through. It can't go through the system because of her death ...
>
>But ... this is all very new. The implications of this legislation are just
>coming known so maybe it can be investigated more, you know?
>
>TMc:
>Ms. Tadura. Thanks so much for your time on this.
>
>AT:
>You're welcome.
>
>Barbara Budd:
>Amanda Tadura is with the Elizabeth Fry Society in Sudbury. We tried to reach
>Ontario's Minister of Social Services to speak to him about the Rogers case
>but he wasn't available, but in a prepared statement the Ministry's
>officials said they are saddened by the tragedy; however they say they have
>to determine the facts before they comment.
>
Tom Walker
Bowen Island, BC
604 947 2213

Reply via email to