It seems to me that Barkley is demanding too much of a theory of value.
Remember what values are in formal terms. They are a set of coercion
operators that map usevalue types onto a single scalar type.
Thus the value of corn is a function of form (corn -> value),
that of horses a function of fo
It seems to me that Barkley is demanding too much of a theory of value.
Remember what values are in formal terms. They are a set of coercion
operators that map usevalue types onto a single scalar type.
Thus the value of corn is a function of form (corn -> value),
that of horses a function of fo
Re: LTV defence
Thanks to Allin for going to the trouble of detailing his views
on the LTV. There are several points on which I could comment,
but I will restrict myself to one key aspect of his treatment
in posting 6 of Chapter I, Vol. I of Capital--as Gil put it,
"the place to
Re: LTV defence
Thanks to Allin for going to the trouble of detailing his views
on the LTV. There are several points on which I could comment,
but I will restrict myself to one key aspect of his treatment
in posting 6 of Chapter I, Vol. I of Capital--as Gil put it,
"the place to
