it's Oscar Lange's aphorism, I believe, that says that neoclassical
economics is the economics of socialism.
Gee, should I reply to Allin's contribution, setting off a long debate??
No way: too much work to do already.
in pen-l solidarity,
Jim Devine BITNET: jndf@lmuacadINTERNET: [EMAIL P
it's Oscar Lange's aphorism, I believe, that says that neoclassical
economics is the economics of socialism.
Gee, should I reply to Allin's contribution, setting off a long debate??
No way: too much work to do already.
in pen-l solidarity,
Jim Devine BITNET: jndf@lmuacadINTERNET: [EMAIL P
What's special about labor? (concluded)
===
1. Whose aphorism was it, that Marxian economics is the economics
of capitalism, while neoclassical economics is the economics of
socialism? You can see the general idea: Marxian categories are fine
for exposing the injustic
What's special about labor? (concluded)
===
1. Whose aphorism was it, that Marxian economics is the economics
of capitalism, while neoclassical economics is the economics of
socialism? You can see the general idea: Marxian categories are fine
for exposing the injustic
