LTV defense, part 2

First substantive remarks: On Sraffa-Steedman == 1. There is no doubt a nice Latin name for the fallacy of seeking to defend one's own position by attacking one's opponent's. Nonetheless I will open by doing exactly that. Why? Because there is

LTV defense, part 2

First substantive remarks: On Sraffa-Steedman == 1. There is no doubt a nice Latin name for the fallacy of seeking to defend one's own position by attacking one's opponent's. Nonetheless I will open by doing exactly that. Why? Because there is