Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability(fwd)

2000-05-19 Thread md7148
I would add one more thing.Weber's definition of state is quite misleading. If state is defined in terms of monopolization of power,I don't think this is unique to capitalist state. If you carefully read Weber's _Sociology of Ancient Civilizations_, where he analyzes pre-capitalist states, you wi

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability (fwd)

2000-05-19 Thread Jim Devine
>Jim Devine wrote: >In the terms I used, this positing of possessiveness >reflected Hobbes' experience with the English Civil War and the rise of >capitalist competition. < Mine writes: >Yes and No. Hobbes was not *simply* writing under the influence of his >circumstances. He was also *norma

Re: Marx and Malleability (fwd)

2000-05-19 Thread Charles Brown
>>> "J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/19/00 11:07AM >>> Charles, Frankly, I see the "withering away of the state" as a millennial vision, like the second coming in Christianity. When John the Baptist met Yeshua bin Miriam he declared that he was the messiah and the "end is ne

Re: Marx and Malleability (fwd)

2000-05-19 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
hould not do so today either, although the current political climate is distinctly reactionary, as near as I can tell. Barkley Rosser -Original Message- From: Charles Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, May 18, 2000 10:31 PM Subj

Marx and Malleability (fwd)

2000-05-19 Thread Charles Brown
>>> "J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/18/00 05:11PM >>> Mark, So, was this utopian or not? We certainly did not see any withering away of the state, not in the former USSR, not in the PRC, not anywhere that was or is ruled by a self-labeled Communist Party (or some variation

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability (fwd)

2000-05-18 Thread md7148
Jim Devine wrote: >In the terms I used, this positing of possessiveness reflected >Hobbes' experience with the English Civil War and the rise of capitalist >competition. Yes and No. Hobbes was not *simply* writing under the influence of his circumstances. He was also *normatively* endorsing ca

Marx and Malleability (fwd)

2000-05-18 Thread Charles Brown
>>> "J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/18/00 01:33PM >>> The utopianism came in when he actually discussed what socialism would be, or more precisely communism, e.g. the withering away of the state and "from each according to his ability to each according to his needs;" all very ni

Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability (fwd)

2000-05-18 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
2 PM Subject: [PEN-L:19239] RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability (fwd) >Barkley Rosser: > >> The utopianism came >> in when he actually discussed what socialism would >> be, or more precisely communism, e.g. the withering >> away of the state and

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability (fwd)

2000-05-18 Thread Jim Devine
I wrote: >>This is basically right, except that Hobbes did not "naturalize" property ownership.<< Mine writes: >in fact, he did. this is the sole idea behind R's criticism of Hobbes in _On the Origins of Inequality_. Hobbes falsely projected what is social (property) onto human nature, to sa

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability (fwd)

2000-05-18 Thread md7148
Jim Devine wrote:. >This is basically right, except that Hobbes did not "naturalize" property >ownership. in fact, he did. this is the sole idea behind R's criticism of Hobbes in _On the Origins of Inequality_. Hobbes falsely projected what is social (property) onto human nature, to say that

RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability (fwd)

2000-05-18 Thread Mark Jones
Barkley Rosser: > The utopianism came > in when he actually discussed what socialism would > be, or more precisely communism, e.g. the withering > away of the state and "from each according to his > ability to each according to his needs;" all very nice, > but also very utopian, especially t

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability (fwd)

2000-05-18 Thread Jim Devine
>In fact some Marxists argue that although Marx did not completely agree >with R's notion of the general will, he was positively inlfluenced by R's >critique of private property (unlike liberals like Hobbes and Locke who >naturalized property ownership as a basis for apologizing inequalities a

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability (fwd)

2000-05-18 Thread md7148
In fact some Marxists argue that although Marx did not completely agree with R's notion of the general will, he was positively inlfluenced by R's critique of private property (unlike liberals like Hobbes and Locke who naturalized property ownership as a basis for apologizing inequalities and poss

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability (fwd)

2000-05-18 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
e: Thursday, May 18, 2000 1:16 PM Subject: [PEN-L:19221] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability (fwd) Barkley wrote: >In the Critique of the Gotha Program he clearly goes totally utopian in his programmatic speculations. Just the contrary. _The Critique of the Gotha Program_ is one of

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability (fwd)

2000-05-18 Thread md7148
Barkley wrote: >In the Critique of the Gotha Program he clearly goes totally utopian in his programmatic speculations. Just the contrary. _The Critique of the Gotha Program_ is one of the most "realist" criticisms of the program of the Eisenach faction of the German social democratic movement.