Top Financial News

05/21 16:33
Merrill, Spitzer Reach Settlement With $100 Mln Fine (Update9)
By Stephen Cohen and Philip Boroff


New York, May 21 (Bloomberg) -- Merrill Lynch & Co. will pay $100
million and stop giving investment bankers a say in how much
analysts are paid to settle charges by New York Attorney General
Eliot Spitzer that the firm's research misled investors.

The biggest securities firm by capital will create a panel to
review stock rating changes and appoint someone for one year to
ensure the firm lives up to the agreement. The agreement may do
little to limit the conflicts of interest that led Merrill
analysts to recommend shares of clients while privately
disparaging the companies, some investors say.

"The punishment may not be as severe as people expected," said
Bruce Simon, who oversees $18 billion as chief investment officer
at Glenmede Trust Co. "I don't think it changes the way Wall
Street operates or eliminates the inherent conflict of interest."
Merrill shares rose as much as 5.1 percent today.

The settlement provides a template for agreements with other
firms, said Spitzer, who is investigating Credit Suisse First
Boston, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., Citigroup Inc.'s
Salomon Smith Barney Inc. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. He said
the agreement will help restore faith in Wall Street, which has
been shaken by the collapse of the Internet and
telecommunications stock bubbles.

"It is only through real reform that investor confidence will be
restored, and this agreement provides real reform," Spitzer said
a news conference.

The fine is 2.4 percent of Merrill's 2001 operating profit. It's
equal to a $100 million payment by CSFB, which was the fifth-
largest settlement by a Wall Street firm.

Led by Eric Dinallo, Spitzer's head of investor protection, the
attorney general's office last year embarked on a broad probe of
analyst conflicts. The investigation narrowed to Merrill's
Internet group following press accounts of analyst Henry Blodget
lowering his rating of Goto.com Inc. after the Internet search
engine chose a Merrill rival for the lead role in a stock sale.

Spitzer's probe put pressure on Securities and Exchange
Commission Harvey Pitt to begin his own investigation, which he
announced last month.

E-Mails

Spitzer, a 42-year-old Democrat who is running for re-election
this year, last month cited an e-mail in which Blodget conceded
that he spent 85 percent of his time in one week on banking
matters. He confessed in another e-mail that "there is nothing
positive to say" about Internet Capital Group Inc., a stock he
recommended investors "accumulate."

Merrill will continue to pay analysts based on banking, but will
take into account how the transactions analysts work on perform
for Merrill clients. "I see no way that (the settlement) will
impact analyst compensation going forward," Komansky said at news
conference at Merrill's World Financial Center headquarters.

Throughout the negotiations, Spitzer insisted he wouldn't settle
with Merrill without changing how analysts are paid. He contends
it's a conflict for analysts to be paid to help launch an initial
public offering or advise on a merger.

Research analysts will continue to accompany investment bankers
when they solicit business from potential clients. The analysts
will have to get approval from research executives to attend such
pitches. A top-ranked analyst helps securities firms win
investment- banking business because companies want flattering
research reports that will encourage investors to buy shares.

Shares, Bonds Rise

Merrill shares rose 47 cents, or 1.1 percent, to $43.85 after
earlier gaining as much as 5.1 percent.

Spitzer won't create a fund to compensate investors who claim
they lost millions of dollars because of tainted research,
leaving that to class-action lawsuits and private arbitration
cases. The firm faces at least 28 class-action lawsuits from
investors. Spitzer said requiring an explicit admission of
wrongdoing would have been a "death warrant" for the firm.

Merrill apologized to investors for the "inappropriate
communications" brought to light by Spitzer, which "may have
appeared inconsistent with Merrill Lynch's published
recommendations," the firm said in a statement.

"For Merrill, a $100 million fine, is, as far as I am concerned,
an admission of wrongdoing," Spitzer said.

Merrill said it would appoint a compliance monitor for one year
to ensure the firm is keeping its part of the agreement. The
monitor, who hasn't yet been named, may become a permanent
position, Komansky said. The firm will also set up a system to
monitor e-mail messages between its bankers and analysts.

Merrill will highlight the changes, beginning tomorrow, in print
advertisements in newspapers, including the New York Times.

Paying States

Merrill agreed to make a civil payment of $48 million to New York
State and an additional $52 million to settle with all other
states. Both payments are contingent on acceptance of an
agreement by the 50 states that have joined Spitzer's probe.

"We will continue to pursue an inquiry with respect to every
other major firm," Spitzer said, adding that Merrill competitors
"should come and have a forthright conversation with us," and
look at the settlement "as a template."

Credit Suisse First Boston, Morgan Stanley, Goldman, Salomon
Smith Barney, UBS AG's Paine Webber Group Inc. and Bear Stearns
Cos. received subpoenas from Spitzer.

"The whole industry wants to put this issue behind it," said Mark
Bronzo, a money manager who invests in securities firms at
Groupama Asset Management.

Merrill, which lost $11 billion in market value in the month
after Spitzer's investigation was announced on April 8, wants to
head off future lawsuits from regulators. The firm was motivated
to settle because the investigation damaged the company's
reputation, Komansky told employees two weeks ago.

Drexel Burnham Lambert paid the largest fine, $650 million in
1988, followed by Prudential Securities, $371 million in 1993;
Paine Webber, $332.5 million in 1996; and Salomon Brothers, $290
million in 1992.

Goldman Sachs responded today by appointing E. Gerald Corrigan,
former chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York as an ombudsman to prevent conflicts of interest among its
analysts.

"What we're doing is pretty consistent with what the attorney
general is getting from Merrill Lynch," said Goldman Vice
Chairman Robert Steel. Spitzer has requested information from the
firm, he said. "It's not smart for me to speculate on what might
happen," Steel said. "We feel like we're on the right track."

Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse First Boston declined to
comment. A Bear Stearns spokesman didn't respond to requests for
comment. A Salomon Smith Barney spokeswoman said the firm will
look at ways to further "investor confidence."

UBS Warburg said it has a "independent research committee"
reviewing its ratings changes and initiations of coverage.

Stephen Cutler, the SEC's director of enforcement, called the
settlement "an important milestone for investor protection," and
added "it is not the finish line, and will not preclude our own
efforts on behalf of the investing public."

Merrill is a passive, minority investor in Bloomberg LP, the
parent of Bloomberg News.

Reply via email to