On Tue, 21 May 2002, Fred B. Moseley wrote:
> > a media evaluation web page voted PK's column the most consistently
> > partisan of op-ed regulars.
>
> More partisan that pro-Israeli fire-eater and let's-go-get-Saddam
> William Safire?
Hey, fair's fair -- Safire's a flaming asshole on those iss
"Devine, James" wrote:
>
>
> --
> alas, "partisan" seems to mean "anti-GOP" or "anti-Dem."
> JD
That's what "political" means legally too I believe. That is why "our"
type of political organization can often get tax-exempt status. Opposing
the United States is non-partisan, while opposing (or
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Devine, James wrote:
> By the way, a media evaluation web-page voted PK's column the most
> consistently partisan of op-ed regulars. As I told PK, "not that there's
> anything wrong with it."
More partisan that pro-Israeli fire-eater and let's-go-get-Saddam
William Safir
In Paul Krugman's 5/21/02 NY TIMES colun:>One final thought: This
[accounting reform] isn't just a question of treating American investors
fairly. Like the Asian nations before their crisis, the United States relies
heavily on inflows of foreign capital, inflows that depend on international
faith
