David Shemano wrote:
>From a bankruptcy lawyer's perspective, the concept of requiring the
Bells to license their lines to competitors has turned out to be pipedream.
The DSL industry has imploded over the past year.Several of the companies
that licensed the lines (Northpoint, Rhythms) have
>From a bankruptcy lawyer's perspective, the concept of requiring the Bells
to license their lines to competitors has turned out to be pipedream. The
DSL industry has imploded over the past year.Several of the companies
that licensed the lines (Northpoint, Rhythms) have already filed for
ban
The best argument NetAction and other folks have after the Rush-Sawyer
amendment is that the Bells are wily wabbits who have often managed to
wiggle their way out of other regulatory mandates.
Netaction has a whole white paper on "How The Bells Stole America's Digital
Future" at http://www.netact
