Re: Re: Could Wellstone still win

2002-10-26 Thread Dan Scanlan
There is a long tradition in the US where widows fill in for their fallen husbands. Wellsotone has no widow. The news suggests that they may turn to Walter Mondale, a relic of long ago. Mondale would represent a long step backwards, except that at 75 he would not need to compromise to get reelec

Re: RE: Re: Could Wellstone still win

2002-10-26 Thread Michael Perelman
At 75 Strom was still chasing young girls. They can now outrun him. On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 12:16:01PM -0400, Max B. Sawicky wrote: > Mondale could serve four full Senate terms > and still be younger than Strom Thurmond. > > mbs > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto

Re: Re: Re: Could Wellstone still win

2002-10-26 Thread Michael Perelman
Wellstone, unlike Clinton, had a background of organizing for progressive causes. I never got the impression that he made many compromises to ingratiate himself with the powerful, except for his vote for the Defense of Marriage Act. On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 11:08:52AM -0500, Carrol Cox wrote: > >

RE: Re: Could Wellstone still win

2002-10-26 Thread Max B. Sawicky
Mondale could serve four full Senate terms and still be younger than Strom Thurmond. mbs -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-pen-l@;galaxy.csuchico.edu]On Behalf Of Michael Perelman Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 11:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:31595]

Re: Re: Could Wellstone still win

2002-10-26 Thread Carrol Cox
Michael Perelman wrote: > > Mondale would represent a long > step backwards, except that at 75 he would not need to compromise to get > reelected. Michael, you are still assuming (or at least this text seems to assume) that Democratic support of imperialism or Democratic anti-labor policies a