RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Max Sawicky
I guess they could have been following them. If not, it strikes me as pretty good evidence. mbs > I think that it was 5 minutes or so. > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 01:47:08PM -0400, Max Sawicky wrote: > > How long was 'right away'? > > > > suspiciously, > > max The only evidence > against

Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Perelman
I think that it was 5 minutes or so. On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 01:47:08PM -0400, Max Sawicky wrote: > How long was 'right away'? > > suspiciously, > max > > > > > Tim gives a very hard edge to a serious controversy. I was interviewed by > > a woman writing a book about the role of the "hubby-bom

Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Perelman
That was my intuition. On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:50:41AM -0700, Devine, James wrote: > Michael Perelman writes: >Tim gives a very hard edge to a serious > controversy. I was interviewed by a woman writing a book about the role of > the "hubby-bomber." He makes it sound as if those who doubt hi

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Tim Bousquet
--- Dan Scanlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >...From my perspective, the simplest solution is > >usually the best, and when a woman gets attacked > nine > >times out of ten it's by a man in her life; in this > >case, the husband. See: > >http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/05/23/judibari/inde

Re: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Dan Scanlan
>...From my perspective, the simplest solution is >usually the best, and when a woman gets attacked nine >times out of ten it's by a man in her life; in this >case, the husband. See: >http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/05/23/judibari/index_np.html > This insupportable theory (of the husband

RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:26750] Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins! Michael Perelman writes: >Tim gives a very hard edge to a serious controversy.  I was interviewed by a woman writing a book about the role of the "hubby-bomber."  He makes it sound as if those who doubt his guilt t

RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Max Sawicky
How long was 'right away'? suspiciously, max > > Tim gives a very hard edge to a serious controversy. I was interviewed by > a woman writing a book about the role of the "hubby-bomber." He makes it > sound as if those who doubt his guilt think that the FBI planted the bomb. > I doubt that many

Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Perelman
Tim gives a very hard edge to a serious controversy. I was interviewed by a woman writing a book about the role of the "hubby-bomber." He makes it sound as if those who doubt his guilt think that the FBI planted the bomb. I doubt that many people believe that. The only evidence against the FBI

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Max Sawicky
I'm more afraid of the FBI than of Earth First. No tree-hugger ever denied me my constitutional rights. mbs > The largest question of all is Did any of the Earth > First work on the north coast save even one tree from > the timber industry? > > tim > > --- Max Sawicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Tim Bousquet
Watching a fund-raising industry develop around the Bari case by a fake environmental movement has been disgusting. I haven't seen yet there's been any money awarded, but I'll bet bottom dollar that almost none of it goes to actual environmental work. People got rich on this case-- people who knew

RE: Re: RE: Re: Judi Bari Wins!

2002-06-12 Thread Max Sawicky
The "larger question" is misconduct by a law enforcement agency that is acquiring increasing powers as we speak, not the possible details of a domestic dispute. We should keep our priorities straight. mbs > While clearly the verdict in this trial is > appropriate, in that the FBI and the Oakl