Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Gold

2001-07-13 Thread Michael Perelman
; > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 9:20 PM > Subject: [PEN-L:15076] Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Gold > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Michael Perelman wrote: > > > > > David, I am not sure that anybody but you and Jim are following this > > > discu

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Gold

2001-07-13 Thread Christian Gregory
Ditto. - Original Message - From: Michael Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 9:20 PM Subject: [PEN-L:15076] Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Gold > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Michael Perelman wrote: > > > David, I a

Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Gold

2001-07-12 Thread Michael Pollak
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Michael Perelman wrote: > David, I am not sure that anybody but you and Jim are following this > discussion. Actually I'm enjoying Jim's responses a lot. Michael __ Michael PollakNew Y

Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Gold

2001-07-12 Thread Joel Blau
Michael: I don't thnk it should be pushed off list, but if it is, I'd like to be included. Joel Blau Michael Perelman wrote: > David, I am not sure that anybody but you and Jim are following this > discussion. What you claim would be largely orrect in a world without > any credit whatsoever.

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Gold

2001-07-12 Thread Michael Perelman
David, I am not sure that anybody but you and Jim are following this discussion. What you claim would be largely orrect in a world without any credit whatsoever. Anyway, if this is not of general interest, maybe it could continue with you an Jim offlist? On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 06:59:44PM -0700

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Gold

2001-07-12 Thread David Shemano
In reply to Jim Devine: Instead of engaging in a specific point-counter-point, let me make a series of comments and ask a couple of questions that are generally responsive to your statements. 1. What is the evidence that the gold standard had anything to do with the economic contraction in

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Gold

2001-07-03 Thread Christian Gregory
> > Therefore, it is critical to my argument that, generally speaking, a change > in the gold price is NOT a reflection of a change in the scarcity of gold, > but a reflection of a change in the scarcity of the currency. > Gotcha. There are a couple of assumptions that we don't share. The first

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Gold

2001-07-02 Thread David Shemano
Christian Gregory writes: --- > > I am a believer in the price system as the best way to determine production > and allocation of resources. In order for the price system to work most > effectively, I want a change in prices to represent information other than

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Gold

2001-06-29 Thread Jim Devine
I wrote: >class and expansionary nature of capitalism.>> David Shemano wrote: >Where did this come from and what does this have to do with the topic at >hand? Sorry -- I didn't finish my thought. As far as I could tell