Doug Henwood wrote:
>
>
> And "scummy" Negri is still under the care of the Italian state
> because they think he's a dangerous revolutionary.
>
Stalin mobilized Odessa workers against a pogrom. That was indeed a
dangerous revolutionary act-- more dangerous to the regime than anything
Negri h
The difference seems to be
that Hardt seems to be pretty positively disposed toward
ultra-imperialism (imperialist unity) or what he and Negri call
"empire."
.. so the only question is, "what can be learned from such
scum?"
Joanna
Title: RE: [PEN-L:33194] Re: RE: Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire.
As Ahmet says and Carrol agrees,
> I do not understand the need for a label. <
that's right. Labels don't really help much, especially since they tend to become reified. (Also, I'm no expert on postmode
I do not understand the need for a label. Having said this, my reading
of their book suggests that, on the one hand, they are, in their own
way, critical of "
post-modernist" theories, on the other, they approvingly use the concept
of "post-modernity" to identify the present phase of the capita
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/18/02 17:20 PM >>>
> Devine, James wrote:
>
>>>joanna bujes quotes Michael Hardt:
>>>We can be confident that in the long run their >>>realinterests will lead
>>>global elites to support empire and refuse any >>>project of US imperialism.
>>
>>this sentence sounds like an
Doug Henwood wrote:
>
> Devine, James wrote:
>
> >joanna bujes quotes Michael Hardt:
> >> >We can be confident that in the long run their real interests will lead
> >> >global elites to support empire and refuse any project of US imperialism.
> >
> >this sentence sounds like an assertion of i
Title: RE: [PEN-L:33190] Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire.
> Devine, James wrote:
>
> >joanna bujes quotes Michael Hardt:
> >> >We can be confident that in the long run their real
> interests will lead
> >> >global elites to support empire and refuse any project
> of US imperialism.
> >
> >
