Mark Jones wrote:
>why is there this slowdown that the Fed
>can't help by reducing rates?
Because it's more of a 19th century slowdown than a post-WW II one,
with a financial hangover from the burst Nasdaq/tech bubble, and a
real sector one from overinvestment in gadgets. It's probably going
Doug Henwood wrote:
> That's me, Mr Sport! I'm used to Mark, I can take it.
So coming straight to the point, why is there this slowdown that the Fed
can't help by reducing rates?
Mark
Michael Perelman:
>
>
> I don't disagree with you about the new economy. I have a section in my
> new book that says pretty much what you say, but the way you said it might
> seem offensive to Doug. I hope not. He is usually a good sport.
I like to think of any needles I unintentionally insert
Michael Perelman wrote:
>I don't disagree with you about the new economy. I have a section in my
>new book that says pretty much what you say, but the way you said it might
>seem offensive to Doug. I hope not. He is usually a good sport.
That's me, Mr Sport! I'm used to Mark, I can take it.
I don't disagree with you about the new economy. I have a section in my
new book that says pretty much what you say, but the way you said it might
seem offensive to Doug. I hope not. He is usually a good sport.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 08:32:40PM +0100, Mark Jones wrote:
> Michael Perelman wrot
http://www.apocalyptic-theories.com/gallery/horsemen/durerhorsemen.html
- Original Message -
From: "Max Sawicky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 9:38 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:12364] RE: Re: Relevance, was Re:mita
> hey, I'm worse than that. I'm the four
