Rod Hay wrote:
population growth has
stabilized. Why should it not in other areas of the world.
On energy. Why do we have to assume a static energy technology?
For practical
purposes, the amount of energy available is infinite.
Rod, this only shows that you don't understand the problem.
Mark, rarely has anybody included so many ad hominems in one post.
Perhaps this is a record. Please. We are keeping that sort of discussion
off this list.
On another note, I don't understand why you are disagreeing with Gene.
Isn't it true that you and I consume many more resources than the
Population growth may be a problem in one place but not in another. Hereabouts the
problem is not population growth but population decline. Where 60 years ago there
was a large family on every quarter section or so now there is a small family
every 2 or 3 sections. Hog density is increasing
I wasn't honestly aware of any ad hominems, you know I hate that sort of
thing, but if you say so, then it is so, and I'm already falling on my
sword, Maximus Michaelimus.
As for Gene, I'm afraid he misunderstood Bartlett completely, and obviously
misunderstands the issue too.
Mark Jones
