Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory

2001-02-17 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
d analysis, but I think one needs to do more than that. Barkley Rosser -Original Message- From: Forstater, Mathew [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, February 16, 2001 6:50 PM Subject: [PEN-L:8226] RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory Seriously, they

RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory

2001-02-16 Thread Forstater, Mathew
Seriously, they have like ten papers on this topic from every angle. The one I have doesn't do any of the history, just mentions Smith and Young once, and then the bit on Arrow. I'd love to see the one you have. I never even heard of the jl your talking about. Does your school subsc. to these?

RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory

2001-02-16 Thread Lisa Ian Murray
Barkley wrote: Basically they do a very careful review of past approaches to growth theory and show that many of the classical writers, starting with Adam Smith, had essentially fully developed models of growth that incorporate the essential ideas of "new endogenous growth theory."